International Civil Fraud - Cyprus
Contributed by Patrikios Pavlou & Associates LLC
07 February, 2014

Type of legal system
The Cyprus legal system is largely based on common law. Cyprus, as a former British colony, inherited common law doctrines and principles which were codified into legislation when the Republic of Cyprus was established in 1960. The Cyprus legal system benefits from the certainty of a codified law and the flexibility of well-developed common law and equity principles.
English case law and principles are widely applied and provide valuable guidance to the Cyprus courts. This stems statutorily from section 29(1)(c) of the Courts of Justice Law 1960 (Courts of Justice Law) which provides that common law is generally applied in Cyprus in the absence of other legislative provisions.
Statute
Fraud can arise under statute as:
- a tort (civil wrong) under the Civil Wrongs Law, Cap. 148. Section 36 of the Civil Wrongs Law essentially codifies English common law principles relating to tort. The law is to be interpreted according to the legal principles that prevail in England, and the terms in law will be given the same meaning as in English law (section 2, Civil Wrongs Law); and
- contractual fraud, under the Contracts Law, Cap. 149. Contractual fraud is covered in section 17 of the Contracts Law. Section 2 of the Contracts Law mirrors the interpretation guidelines found in the Civil Wrongs Law (see above).
Statutory provisions relating to fraud are also found in the Companies Law, Cap. 113, which mirrors the English Companies Act 1948, particularly in section 180 relating to directors' fiduciary duties.
Case law
Cypriot case law has stressed repeatedly that the codification of tort and contract law is not exhaustive in relation to fraud. Therefore Cyprus courts can look to English case law for guidance, with Cyprus cases prevailing if available.
For example other instances of fraud, such as the tort of conspiracy to defraud in the English case Scott v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1975] AC 910,are available under common law. Therefore, any type of civil fraud recognised by common law is part of Cyprus law.
The nature of Cyprus fraud was examined in Pyrgas v Stavridou (1969) 1 CLR 332. The court stated that fraud, under section 36 of the Civil Wrongs Law, is one of a species of fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation, also known as actual fraud.
A Cyprus court has affirmed that the Civil Wrongs Law does not cover civil wrongs exhaustively (Vassiliou v Vassiliou (XVI CLR 70101)). Therefore it does not exclude common law claims for civil wrongs that are not contained in the Civil Wrongs Law.
This was further elaborated in Paikkos v Kontemeniotis (1989) 1 CLR 50, where the court stated that common law principles apply as long as:
- they are not contrary to the Constitution of Cyprus;
- they are suitable for the special circumstances of Cyprus; and
- they are not contrary to any provision of any law of Cyprus, where that law has the obvious aim of diverting from the common law.
- The main elements of cause of action in Cyprus based on civil fraud
Tort
The tort of fraud consists of a false representation made with the knowledge that it is false, with the intention that the person deceived will act on this representation and suffer damage as a result (section 36, Civil Wrongs Law).
The main components of civil fraud under tort law are:
- a false representation of a fact or event;
- knowledge by the person making the representation that it was false or he had no true conviction that the representation was true;
- intention that the person to whom the representation was addressed would act on the representation;
- the person acts on this representation; and
- the person suffers damage.
Contractual fraud
The definition of contractual fraud includes any of the following actions made with the intention of deceiving the other contracting party, or manipulating him to enter into a contract (section 17, Contracts Law):
- the representation of a false fact as being true by a person who has no belief in it being true;
- actively concealing a fact by a person who has knowledge of that fact or believes in it;
- a promise which was given without any intention of it being fulfilled;
- any other deceitful action with the aim to deceive; or
- any act or omission which is specifically defined by the law as fraudulent.
The Supreme Court has asserted that it is also necessary to prove that the fraudulent representation was made in bad faith(Charalambous v Charalambous (2001) 1 AAD 71).
Mere silence as to the facts which may affect the will of the person about to enter into the contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances are such that the person being silent may be found to be committing a fraud.
- Remedies available under Cyprus law in relation to civil fraud
There are four main types of remedies available to courts in Cyprus:
- damages;
- declarations;
- special/specific performance; and
- court orders.
The most common remedy is damages in the form of compensation. Special/specific performance and court orders stem from principles of equity, are discretionary, and are used by the courts when the circumstances are appropriate.
Contract
Section 73 of the Contracts Law provides for compensation for damage caused due to breach of contract. It does not allow compensation for remote or indirect damages (see section 4).
The requirements for special/specific performance are contained in section 76(1) of the Contracts Law. The courts can make a specific order to enforce certain aspects of a contract and can also issue declaratory judgments on the request of the claimant. The court will grant remedies, following common law and equity principles, based on the principle of restitution (see section 4).
The contract can be rescinded if any element of fraud is found in the contract and, as such, it is not necessary that the innocent party's actions were made exclusively due to the fraudulent representation. In this case the parties are relieved from their obligations under the contract, and the party that gained any benefit from the contract must return this benefit or compensate the other party from whom that benefit was obtained (section 59, Contracts Law). However, punitive damages are not available for contractual fraud.
Tort
In tort, the person defrauded is to be compensated to restore him into his previous position as if the fraud had not occurred. Courts can use restitution (see section 4) and equitable tracing to aid restitution and claim the fruits that result from the fraud.
Damages for tort intend to put the claimant in the position he would have been in had the fraud not been committed (see Section 4). Cyprus courts can award damages to allow the claimant to recover and be compensated for all loss and damage suffered due to the tort.
Courts can also award punitive or exemplary damages for a fraud committed in tort, when appropriate, to punish a defendant or deter similar future behaviour. However, punitive or exemplary damages are rarely awarded.
- Damages: basis of calculation
General
Tortious and contractual damages differ but they both intend to compensate the claimant for the loss or damage suffered. The basis for compensation is the actual loss or damage, and may also include any foreseeable loss. In general, all damage that can be reasonably linked to the fraud can be recovered.
There are two main principles regarding compensation as a remedy for fraud in both tort and contract law:
- according to the restitutionary principle, the innocent party should be adequately compensated. This means that he should return to the position he was prior to the contract, or be put in the position he would have been in if the contract had been properly performed. This may not always be applicable or possible;
- if the restitutionary principle is impractical, compensation can be calculated on the basis of the monetary amount invested in the contract. This can be calculated in a number of ways. In the English case Anglia Television Ltd v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690, the court could not determine the profit from the participation of an actor in a television series, so it considered how much the channel had spent for that actor to be in the series. Alternatively, compensation can be calculated based on the extent that the other party has profited from the contract. In the English case Attorney General v Blake [2000] UKHL 45, the court ordered all proceeds from a published book written by a spy to be paid as compensation for breach of a confidentiality agreement.
In principle, the Supreme Court does not intervene in an award of damages granted by a first instance court, unless the Supreme Court believes that the first instance court directed itself wrongly on the principles for deciding the award, or if the award itself is excessive.
Tort
The Civil Wrongs Law does not specifically provide how the courts should award damages in tort. Damages are calculated on different principles and vary according to the cause of action. Damages for tort intend to put the claimant in the position he would have been in had the fraud not been committed. Cyprus courts can award damages to allow the claimant to recover and be compensated for all loss and damage suffered due to the tort.
Courts can also award punitive or exemplary damages for a fraud committed in tort, when appropriate, to punish a defendant or deter similar future behaviour. However, punitive or exemplary damages are rarely awarded.
Contract
In contract law, damages under section 73 of the Contracts Law are designed to put the claimant in the position which he would have been in had the contract not been breached. If a false representation is made, damages intend to put the claimant in the position which he would have been in had the representation been true.
Exemplary or punitive damages are not available for breach of contract. Additionally, the contract can be rescinded to put the parties in the position they were in before entering into it.
Cyprus courts apply several principles that guide them through the calculation of damages. The nature and circumstances of the contract determine the amount of compensation. Moreover, difficulty in calculating the damages cannot be a hindrance to the award of damages. Compensation should be sufficient but not to the extent that it benefits the party more than if the contract had been properly performed.
- Available interim relief
Interim orders can be issued if the court is convinced that (section 32, Courts of Justice Law):
- there is a serious issue to be tried;
- the applicant has a chance of success in his claim; and
- it will be difficult or impossible to do justice at a later stage if the interim order is not granted.
Orders can be granted ex parte, since an application for interim relief can be made without notice if it is urgent or other special circumstances justify not giving notice to the opponent (section 9(1), Civil Procedure Law, Cap. 6). A court has wide discretion as to what interim measures it can issue.
The courts can, depending on the nature of relief sought, grant any of the following interim relief orders:
- freezing orders, also known as Mareva injunctions. They are prohibitory injunctions to restrain the respondent from dealing with his assets, to ensure they are not dissipated before judgment. This is to ensure there are sufficient funds to satisfy any later money judgment made by the court;
- disclosure orders, also known as Norwich Pharmacal orders. They identify wrongdoers and the current location of alienated assets, if unknown. Disclosure will only be ordered by the court if there are sufficient grounds, for example that it is necessary in the interests of justice. A standard form freezing order includes an order against the defendant for disclosure of their assets on affidavit, but may also target third parties who may hold information about assets, such as banks, accountants and lawyers. Disclosure may also be ordered in Cyprus in respect of ancillary proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. Disclosure orders may also be sought against third parties to obtain information to support claims, though this often has to wait until later in the proceedings. Third party disclosure orders permit a court to order discovery from a person against whom the applicant has no cause of action, and who is not a party to the litigation proceedings;
- search and seizure orders, also known as Anton Piller orders. These are mandatory injunctions to prevent the destruction of key evidence. They can be granted where there is a strong prima facie case, clear evidence that the respondent possesses material evidence that may be destroyed and potential damage to the applicant that is likely to be significant. In Cyprus, the principles of the Anton Piller order were applied and adopted in Re Pelekanos (1989) 1 CLR 178. Given the 'draconian nature' of such an order, it can only be applied to the extent necessary to achieve the purpose for which it is granted;
- other mandatory orders where appropriate, for example for delivery of possession. However, obtaining these is usually more difficult than obtaining prohibitive orders, and they are usually only granted if necessary to preserve the existing state of affairs or the previous state of affairs;
- appointment of a receiver, to preserve an asset that may be taken away or alienated by the respondent or for other purposes, including appointing a receiver in a company with specific powers in exceptional situations;
- anti-suit injunctions preventing a party from taking steps in other jurisdictions, in cross-border claims and in exceptional cases; and
- interim relief to support foreign proceedings when fraud claims are raised outside Cyprus, especially in commercial arbitration, and there is a connection to Cyprus rendering the issue of interim orders by a Cyprus court useful for a claimant.
- Bars to relief for civil fraud
- Delay
Delay cannot generally be a bar to relief as long as the civil fraud claim is made within the limitation period (see below, Applicable limitation periods). However, in Margarita Christou Pourgouridi v Themidos Vasou Mezou (1994) 1 AAD 201, it was ruled that a six-year delay in bringing an action for trespass over land was a tacit acceptance of the trespass and the claimant was estopped from claiming any damage.
In addition, delay may affect the obtaining of interim relief. The claimant may not be able to prove that it will be difficult or impossible to do justice at a later stage if the interim order is not granted (see section 5). However, the Supreme Court has ruled that delay should not preclude the courts from granting interim relief if there is a risk that the claimant may suffer further damage (Martha Georgiou Ilia Plakidi v Nomisko Developers LTD (2010) 1 AAD 557).
- (Lack of) good faith
Lack of good faith may act as a bar to equitable relief (see section 3). This concept has been specifically endorsed in Cyprus in cases of ex parte applications for interim relief, under section 9 of the Courts of Justice Law. The Supreme Court has ruled that there is an obligation of full and frank disclosure when the applicant applies for interim relief by an ex parte application. If the applicant fails to fully disclose the material facts, this amounts to lack of good faith, and any interim relief granted at the ex parte stage is dismissed (Demstar Limited ? Zim Israel Navigation Co Limited (1996) 1 CLR 597).
- Applicable limitation periods
Cypriot law imposes time-barring provisions for all claims and actionable rights (limitation of action periods). It is not possible to analyse all the relevant limitation of action legislation in this article, since it relates to a history of inter-communal disturbances and several pieces of legislation suspending its application.
The most recent legislation is the new Limitation Law (N. 66(I)/2012), which entered into force on 1 July 2012 with respect to limitation periods for actionable rights:
- section 3 of the Limitation Law provides that the limitation period starts running from the day of completion of the basis of the claim (defined in section 2 as all events that give rise to an actionable right concerning a claim);
- the Limitation Law stipulates that a general limitation period of six years both for civil wrongs (section 6) and for actions based on contractual claims (section 7) applies. This general limitation period is subject to exceptions that provide for shorter limitation periods, and/or the right to extend the limitation period under certain circumstances.
- Position of good faith purchaser for value without notice (innocent third parties)
A good faith purchaser for value without notice and generally innocent third parties are recognised and protected in Cyprus. For example the Contracts Law provides that a contract entered into as a result of fraudulent representations is voidable and not void. The Contracts Law is interpreted in accordance with the interpretation rules applicable in England (section 2, Contracts Law). As such, a voidable contract would not affect the rights acquired by an innocent third party in a subsequent transaction.
- Aspects of pleading fraud in Cyprus
- Lifting the corporate veil
A fundamental principle of company law in Cyprus, stemming from English common law, is that a company has a separate legal personality from its members (Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22). As such, the company's shareholders cannot be held personally liable for its debts and/or liabilities. However, there are circumstances where a court will lift or pierce the corporate veil and look beyond the separate personality of the company to its shareholders or directors, to establish liability.
One such circumstance and a statutory exception to the above principles is section 311 of the Companies Law, which covers fraudulent trading. A shareholder can be personally liable for the debts of the company if, in the course of the winding up of a company, it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person or for any fraudulent purpose, and the shareholder was knowingly party to the carrying on of the business in this way (section 311, Companies Law).
The intention to defraud creditors is ascertained by a subjective test. In situations where the directors of the company know that the creditors are not going to be paid, but the company still carries on with business activities resulting in the company incurring debts, it can be inferred that business is being carried on with the intention to defraud (Re William C Leitch Brothers Ltd [1932] 2 Ch 71). The references to 'intent to defraud' and 'fraudulent purpose' in section 311 import an element of actual dishonesty for which evidence must be adduced to prove fraud (Re Patrick and Lyon Ltd [1933] Ch 786).
The Salomon principle (see above) cannot be used as an engine of fraud, or to avoid pre-existing legal obligations (Gilford Motor Company Ltd. v Horne [1933] Ch. 935). The English Court of Appeal in this case held that the company was a mere façade or sham, formed to disguise Horne's breach.
In Kensington International Ltd v Congo [2005] EWHC 2684 (Comm), the court held that various transactions and company structures were a sham or facade with no legal substance, and were simply set up to defeat claims of creditors against the Republic of Congo. The court pierced the corporate veil in relation to the particular transactions and structures.
However, a fraudulent activity does not necessarily justify piercing the corporate veil. In Dadourian Group v Simms [2006] EWHC 2973 (Ch), there was no conspiracy to injure the claimant, but a genuine intention that the company would buy equipment under a contract. Therefore, the corporate veil was not lifted. There is an increasing reluctance, evidenced by English court decisions, in relation to lifting the veil in the absence of a sham. The veil will not be lifted simply because it is in the interests of justice to do so. A recent example is the case of VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 5.
- Settlements/exclusion clauses
A contractual clause purporting to restrict or entirely exclude a person's liability or a legal obligation from arising is termed an exclusion clause. Exclusion clauses found in standard form contracts often attempt to exclude the rights and expectations of the weaker party to a contract. Under Cypriot law, there is no way to limit or exclude liability for fraud through exclusion clauses.
There are several common law actions that invalidate the effect of exclusion clauses, for example misrepresentation, and special rules for interpreting exclusion clauses in the case of negligent liability. The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Law 1996 provides additional legal protection against exclusion clauses in the case of negligence, but makes no specific reference to fraud.
Moreover, an express statement made at the time of formation of a contract, which is inconsistent with a written exclusion clause, overrides the effect of the exclusion clause. The contra proferentem rule also allows for the interpretation of an exclusion clause against the party relying on it, when the clause is ambiguous.
In addition, liability for fraud can neither be excluded nor limited before the committing of the fraud, since 'fraud unravels all' (S Pearson & Son Ltd v Dublin Corp [1907] AC 351).
- Extension of limitation
If fraud is involved in a claim or actionable right, and the defendant's fraud conceals the claimant's right of action, the relevant limitation period is extended (see section 6.3, Applicable limitation periods). The limitation period is suspended until the fraud is discovered by the claimant or could have been discovered by the claimant with reasonable diligence. In addition, the limitation period begins to run if the claimant's agent or any person whose actions bind the claimant discovers the fraud, or the fraud could have been discovered by such persons with reasonable diligence. This is also the case when an action is brought to relieve the claimant from the consequences of a mistake. The limitation period is suspended until that mistake is discovered.
Any deliberate breach of duty in circumstances which would make discovery of fraud especially difficult is equivalent to a deliberate concealment of fact in relation to the breach.
- Punitive damages
Exemplary or punitive damages are not available for breach of contract (see section 4).
Courts can award punitive or exemplary damages for a fraud committed in tort, when appropriate, to punish a defendant or deter similar future behaviour. However, punitive or exemplary damages are rarely awarded (see Section 4).
In case of fraud, the loss suffered by the claimant need not be a foreseeable consequence of the fraud (Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd [1997] 1 BCLC 350). This allows for a greater scope in relation to the recovery of damages.
- Standard of proof
In civil cases, the principle 'he who asserts must prove' applies. The party making a claim bears the burden of proving the claim in court (Leshi Ippodromion Lefkosias v Andrea Konstantinou (2004) 1 AAD 1580).
The standard of proof required in civil cases before Cypriot courts, as regards the legal and evidential burden, is that of proof on the balance of probabilities, simply meaning that one party has clearer and more convincing evidence in his favour than the other party.
The more serious the allegation, the more compelling the evidence will need to be to satisfy the court on the balance of probabilities. When the allegation in a civil action is that of fraud, which carries significant gravity, more compelling evidence is required to tilt the balance of probabilities, therefore setting a higher standard of proof for civil cases concerning fraud. These assertions are illustrated by Cyprus case law and in principle, fraud is more difficult to prove and the courts seem generally reluctant to conclude that fraud has been committed.
- Lawyers' duties when pleading fraud
The duties of lawyers as to the exercise of their profession are imposed by the Advocates Law, Cap 2 (Advocates Law) and the Advocates Ethics Code (Code). The Code sets out general provisions and principles which relate among other things to appropriate behaviour, trust, moral integrity and professional privilege. Additionally, the Code highlights the duties of lawyers as to their relationships with clients, judges, other lawyers, and arbitrators. There is no explicit reference to a higher duty on lawyers when pleading fraud in either the Advocates Law or the Code. However, the general duty of lawyers in the Code to handle a case in a fair manner applies.
The Civil Procedure Rules contain detailed provisions for commencing actions in court and the form of written submissions. An action in which fraud is alleged by the claimant must be commenced by a writ of summons, as generally provided by Order 2.1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (Order 2.6(4), Civil Procedure Rules). Summary judgment cannot be obtained in these circumstances. Historically, this rule has developed in relation to instances where the allegations have a moral dimension of a serious nature.
In all cases in which the party pleading relies on any misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, wilful default, or undue influence, full particulars of it must be stated in the pleading. In the case of fraud, the alleged fraudulent acts must be specially set out and it must be averred that such acts were done fraudulently (Order 19.5, Civil Procedure Rules). This was repeated in the case of Demetrakis Fakonti v Nikolas Pavlou Brioni (2004) 1 ??D 1404.
It is up to individual lawyers to acknowledge the gravity of an allegation of civil fraud, the damage that it can do to individual reputations and private lives and the higher ethical duty they have in such cases.
- Basic requirements in relation to issuing proceedings; applying for injunctive or interim relief; or serving proceedings abroad
Issuing proceedings
To start civil fraud proceedings, a writ of summons must be filed and sealed at a district court. The writ of summons is filed with the court registry during working hours when it is open to the public, which are usually between 8:30 to 13:00 Monday to Friday.
Two copies of the writ of summons must be served on the defendant after they have been certified by the court registrar as true copies of the original. Service of the writ of summons on the defendant is usually effected by a private bailiff, unless leave for alternative service is obtained from the court.
If the writ of summons or notice of it is to be served abroad, leave of the court must be obtained before it can be filed and sealed by the court registrar, unless the person outside Cyprus is a necessary or proper party to an action properly brought against another person duly served in Cyprus (in this case, leave for serving abroad can be obtained after filing the action) (see below, Serving proceedings abroad). If the action is made through an advocate by a claimant who lives in Cyprus at the time of filing the action, it must be accompanied by a retainer proving the appointment of the advocate.
Applying for injunctive or interim relief
Once the action is filed and sealed, the claimant can apply for interim relief from the court where the action was filed. An application for interim relief must be supported by an affidavit and in principle should be made by summons and served on the respondent. However, interim applications are usually urgent or there are other circumstances requiring the claimant to proceed without informing the opponent. In these circumstances, the application can be made ex parte (see section 5). In urgent cases, the advocate can orally request and obtain leave for the application to be heard on the same day or very near to it.
In an ex parte application, one copy of the application attaching the sworn affidavit and relevant exhibits must be filed with the court. The affidavit must be sworn by a person who can positively swear to the facts of the case, or a person who can swear to the best of his knowledge and belief provided he discloses his source of knowledge. If the application is to be served on the other party, two copies of the application, affidavit and exhibits must be served on the respondents after being certified by the court registrar as true copies of the original.
The court on hearing an ex parte application for interim relief can give the following orders (see also section 5):
- grant the interim relief sought, and direct the application and the interim order to be served on the respondent. The respondent will be given a date by which he can oppose the order and/or the application. The interim relief will remain valid in the meantime. This period usually lasts between one to three months or longer, especially in complex matters requiring lengthy preparation time. The interim relief will remain in force after that, if the court rejects the respondent's application to oppose the interim relief;
- order the application to be served on the respondent, so that he has the opportunity to oppose it. The application for interim relief will be set for a new date, so that the claimant has sufficient time to serve the application on the respondent. This period usually lasts between one to three months or longer (see above); or
- reject the application.
If civil fraud claims are made in an EU member state, in a court or arbitral tribunal, interim or injunctive relief can be obtained in Cyprus in support of those proceedings, through Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels Regulation). A Cyprus court has confirmed the application of the Brussels Regulation in Cyprus(Hampton Advisory Group S.A. v Bost Ad and others Civil Appeal No. 13/2009, 27 March 2012).
Serving proceedings abroad
To serve a writ of summons or a notice of it abroad, leave of the court is required. Leave can be obtained by filing an ex parte application with a Cyprus court, supported by affidavit, showing:
- that the court has jurisdiction to hear the case;
- that the claimant has a prima facie good cause of action, showing in what place or country the defendant is or probably may be found; and
- the mode of service, to satisfy the court that the defendant will receive adequate notice of the proceedings.
One copy of the ex parte application attaching the sworn affidavit and the exhibits must be filed with the court. One copy of the application, affidavit and exhibits must be served on the defendant after being certified by the court registrar as a true copy.
The application for leave to serve abroad will usually be determined within three weeks from the date it is filed. In urgent situations, the claimant's advocate can orally request and obtain leave for the application to be heard on the same day, or very near to it.
Service of the application, the court order and the writ of summons or notice of it is usually effected through the prescribed channel provided in the relevant treaty between Cyprus and the country of the opponent:
- Service of documents in EU member states is provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No. 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the member states of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters.
- Service in non-EU countries is provided where relevant by the bilateral and multilateral treaties Cyprus has entered into with Syria, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Serbia, Montenegro, Egypt and China. Additionally, Cyprus is a party to the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters.
- Procedure and requirements for enforcing interim injunctions from abroad in Cyprus
Statute and international treaties
Foreign injunctions issued in an EU member state, or in a country with which Cyprus has entered into a bilateral treaty or which is a signatory to a multilateral treaty to which Cyprus is a party, can be recognised, registered and enforced in Cyprus through statute, specifically the Recognition of Judgments of Foreign Courts (Recognition, Registration, Execution by Means of Contract) Law 2000 (121(I)/2000).
Injunctions issued in EU member states (and Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, which are covered by the Lugano Conventions 1988 and 2007) are enforced through the Brussels Regulation. The Brussels Regulation also covers ex parte injunctions (Denilauler [1980] ECR 1553 (C-125/79)).
In addition, Cyprus has entered into bilateral treaties that provide for the enforcement of interim injunctions with Syria, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Serbia, Montenegro, Egypt and China.
Cyprus is a party to the following multilateral treaties:
- The Hague Convention of 1 February 1971 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
- The New York Convention of 10 June 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
To enforce an injunction using the Cyprus statute (see above), the person in whose favour the injunction was issued must file an application with a Cyprus court supported by an affidavit and serve it on the respondent (if there is no respondent, the application can be made ex parte).
A copy of the application attaching the sworn affidavit and exhibits must be filed with the court. One copy of the application, affidavit and exhibits must be served on the respondent after being certified by the court registrar as a true copy. The application is usually served on the respondent by a private bailiff, unless leave for alternative service is obtained.
The application will be set for a hearing within four weeks from the date it is filed. If the respondent wishes to oppose the application, an opposition must be filed at least two days before the hearing. The grounds for opposing the application must be limited to:
- matters concerning the court's jurisdiction;
- a proved settlement of the original claim; or
- non-compliance with the provisions of the treaty/regulation under which the injunction is to be enforced.
The final determination of the application takes between one to three months.
Common law
To enforce an injunction issued in a country that has no agreement for the recognition of a judgment with Cyprus, the claimant must file a new action in a Cyprus court under common law. The action will follow the usual Cyprus process and timeframes (see section 8). Subject to the final determination of the new action, the applicant can apply for a new injunction in Cyprus.
If the injunction is eligible for recognition under the statute (see above, Statute and international treaties), it cannot be recognised under common law.
« Go Back to Articles
Articles Archive
- 2019
- February (6)
- January (5)
- » Observations of the AGM of Association of Cyprus International Investment Firms
- » Cyprus IBC Capital
- » Three Key Considerations in Establishing your Virtual Currency Investment Fund
- » Lebanon: A Case Study on Efficient Inbound Investment - Tax Structures for Cross-Border Acquisitions
- » Nine Reasons to Work With a Professional When Filing Your Taxes
- 2018
- December (13)
- » Seven ideas for a perfect gift that cost nothing
- » Financial Advisor Hiring 101: What to Ask When Hiring For Your Business
- » The most popular countries in Europe with low taxes
- » Tax amnesty program in Panama for 2018
- » A Tax Advisors Point Of View - Is Malta A Viable Brexit Solution?
- » New rules for property tax and tax homesteads
- » Gibraltar publishes rules implementing EU rules against Tax Avoidance Practices
- » Notaries in Estonia will be empowered to certify documents via video link
- » The Cyprus Tax System Explained in a Simple Way
- » The Power of Sailing BVI Yacht Registration
- » The Intra-Corporate Transfer Regulations
- » 'The UK can unilaterally decide to Remain in the EU' - Advocate General, Court of Justice of the European Union
- » The Accounting Conundrum Solved - Accounting in the UAE Made Simple
- November (9)
- » Rocking Gibraltar
- » Investors: Applying For A Cypriot Passport? Read Our Guide
- » The Draft Withdrawal Agreement and Protocol on Gibraltar
- » Your Essential Guide to Offshore Companies in Dubai
- » Three Best Offshore Asset Structures in Belize
- » What You Need To Know About Standard Banking And Electronic Wallets
- » The Key to a Successful and Family-Friendly Career
- » European Commission proposes new Anti-Money Laundering Directive: 6AMLD
- » Gibraltar Association for New Technologies GANT
- October (9)
- » Financial Substance in Andorra - Part 1 of 2 - How And Why Did It Come About?
- » Financial Substance in Andorra - Part 2 of 2 - How To Comply With Substance In Andorra
- » CySEC: An Overview of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission
- » Non-Residential Tax Returns in the UK
- » Time Is Running Out For Expats Behind on Taxes
- » GDPR WARNING: Why Not Shredding Your Data Could Cost Your Company Millions
- » Trust and Corporate Services Provider (TCSP) Licensing in Hong Kong
- » Cyprus: The Blockchain-friendly Island
- » Securing Your Children's Future with a Cyprus International Trust
- September (18)
- » 10 Most Common Tax Return Mistakes To Avoid
- » Cryptocurrency and Taxes - What You Need to Know
- » Why Getting HK Tax Residency Certificate & How to Benefit?
- » Investment Funds in Cyprus - A Guide for Global Investors
- » Why Should I Care About The FTSE 100?
- » Asset Protection: Your Personal Insurance
- » Why Switzerland Is The Best Place To Establish A Business
- » New type of funds (Cyprus): The Registered AIF (RAIF)
- » Understanding New York Real Estate Taxes
- » What are Fixed Indexed Annuities?
- » Cyprus Citizenship by Investment
- » Forming and Operating a Fund in Cyprus: A Guide for Emerging Cyprus Fund Managers and Investors
- » Cryptocurrency - a wallet or exchange?
- » Start-Up Dilemma: Things to Consider When Looking for the Perfect Office Space for Your Business to Grow
- » Investing in Self-Storage Real Estate
- » Estonia: Register of Beneficiaries in Force
- » Secure Crypto Currency to Physical Gold OTC Exchanges
- » Wolters Kluwer Tax Expert To Speak At Tax Reform Conference
- August (18)
- » Euro Exim Bank's Involvement with Blockchain Technology
- » Traditional Bank A/C Alternatives to Run Business
- » Iceland - Under The Radar Program
- » Launching an ICO through Cyprus
- » Is Your Significant Controllers Register (SCR) Ready?
- » 3 Simple Techniques For Contractors
- » Did you know that a $10K investment can get you a tax-free company and residency in Dubai ?
- » How to Set Up a Crypto Exchange License in the EU: Estonia
- » A Holistic Approach To Regulating Cryptocurrencies And Virtual Financial Assets In Malta
- » Quick overview of Seychelles Legal System
- » Seychelles Updates
- » Notional Interest Deduction (NID) Rules
- » Deduction For Transportation Cost Of Employees Rules
- » VAT Grouping Regulations
- » Malta Ahead Of The Game
- » Seychelles Tax treaties
- » Quick overview of Seychelles business tax
- » Gibraltar Budget 2018
- July (2)
- June (4)
- May (3)
- April (10)
- » Just Announced: 100% Ownership for Dubai Entrepreneurs
- » Why Hong Kong is Your Essential Business Hub
- » Lasting Powers of Attorney in Gibraltar - the Act comes into force
- » The How and Why: Redomiciling your Business in Singapore
- » GDPR - Key Aspects of the General Data Protection Regulation
- » Trademarks: What is the opposition process?
- » GDPR: What Do You Need To Know
- » Financial Advising: Accounting's New Look
- » Why register a trust in Cyprus?
- » How double taxation treaties work
- March (4)
- February (4)
- January (6)
- » Pension for Life: An Achievable Dream
- » Partnerships in Canada: tax haven or undesirable misfortune?
- » Benefits of Setting Up a Shams Free Zone Company In the United Arab Emirates
- » UAE's most dynamic free zone jurisdiction
- » The Future of Global Taxation
- » Common Standard Of Automatic Exchange Of Information On Tax Matters
- December (13)
- 2017
- December (7)
- » Branch Registration in Poland - Establish branch in Poland
- » Cryptocurrencies and the mainstream - bridging the gap to mass market adoption
- » Gibraltar - DLT Guidance Notes Published
- » The High Net Worth Individual Scheme
- » Middle East Faces Significant Challenges To International Business, Survey Finds
- » What impact will Brexit have on Gibraltar Cross-Border Mergers?
- » Tax minimization methods across the world
- November (4)
- October (7)
- » What you "token" about?
- » Legal "non-disclosure" overseas retirement planning
- » Why is it that more businesses blame poor results on currency movements?
- » Bitcoin Tax Strategies & Corporate Structures: Why Governments Worldwide are Scared of Bitcoin's Incredible Potential
- » Build an Offshore company in Hong Kong
- » Film Production Scheme to be introduced in Cyprus
- » ICO - the new way of fund raising for entrepreneurs
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (8)
- » Fear Fintech? Embrace Fintech
- » Publication of Guidance Notes related to Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information by Cyprus Tax Department
- » Law Firms and Marketing Strategy
- » Why will accountants, financial advisers and registrars lose their jobs in coming years?
- » Register of Beneficiaries in Estonia
- » Bitcoin, ethereum, crypto currency and block chain - the next industrial revolution - the new gold - from barter to bitcoin
- » Why partnering with a currency broker is a win for you and your clients
- » BEPS - What is it? & What is the cost on Africa?
- May (6)
- » Caribbean Flourishing Due to Citizenship by Investment
- » The New Zealand "Foreign Trust" regime vs the USA "Foreign Trust" Regime
- » How does one legally avoid paying more than 5% in taxes? Move your business to Malta!
- » Guide to the benefits of owning company shares through a discretionary trust
- » Four jurisdictions to start a company in
- » Global Tax Trends And Impact On Offshore Jurisdictions
- April (3)
- March (4)
- February (18)
- » Exactly which US expats have to file an IRS tax return?
- » The best citizenship by investment programs for 2017
- » Don't make these tax mistakes when you retire
- » How to get a Second Passport and Second Citizenship
- » Still the easiest place in the world to open an offshore bank account
- » Get second residency and pay no tax in these 19 tax-free countries
- » The fastest countries in the world to become a citizen
- » Cyprus introduces rules to implement Country by Country reporting requirements
- » Revised criteria for granting the Cypriot citizenship by investment
- » Potential Non-Dom Solutions: QNUPS
- » Tax Calendar 2017
- » Cyprus Investment Immigration Programmes
- » Reforms to the Taxation of UK Non-Domiciles
- » Potential Non-Dom Solutions: Trusts
- » Restarting the Clock: Residency Solutions for Non-Doms
- » Tax payers given rights to claim deemed deductions on Article 33
- » Declaration of an individual as a non-dom
- » Cyprus Tax Facts 2017
- January (4)
- December (7)
- 2016
- December (5)
- November (4)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (5)
- July (5)
- June (8)
- » The Corporate Governance Review - Cyprus 2016
- » Double Tax Treaty between Cyprus and Latvia signed
- » How Canada Taxes Real Estate Gains Of Non-Residents
- » Cyprus - Seychelles collaboration through the double taxation treaty
- » Eight Myths Regarding Being Non-Resident For Canadian Tax Purposes
- » Tax Issues for Non-Resident Actors & Entertainers in Canada
- » The Tax-Efficient Way For Foreign Corporations To Acquire Canadian Corporations
- » Why do online entrepreneurs need to structure their companies carefully?
- May (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (4)
- March (4)
- January (4)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (6)
- » NEWSLETTER: THE NEW PENSION FLEXIBILITY FROM APRIL 2015: THE DETAIL EXPLAINED
- » NEWSLETTER: THE NEW PENSION DEATH TAXES FROM 6.4.15 EXPLAINED
- » NEWSLETTER: NEW CAPITAL ADEQUACY REQUIREMENTS FOR SIPP PROVIDERS AND UNREGULATED INVESTMENTS WITHIN SIPPS
- » QROPS BULLETIN - NOVEMBER 2014
- » Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC) legislation voted by the State Duma
- » Migrating the residence of the target company from Costa Rican jurisdiction raises tax consequences
- October (2)
- September (5)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (9)
- » Banking in a Tax Haven isn't what it used to be!
- » Italian Tax Cuts
- » Part-Time Self-Employed Tax Submission
- » Life in the Sun: The Ease of Benefitting from Tax Residence in Malta
- » Cyprus Corporate Governance 2014
- » NEWSLETTER: HMRC tightening up on SSASs, unregulated product providers targeting PSLS, recycling issues, and an international pension conference
- » The Liability of Shareholders for the Tax Debts of a Company
- » Relief from Transfer Pricing for Controlled Foreign Companies
- » DFM Platform SIPP
- May (4)
- » The Dispute Resolution Review [Cyprus], Sixth Edition, Editor Jonathan Cotton
- » QROPS BULLETIN - MAY 2014
- » Malta Individual Investor Program - Facilitating Citizenship Through Investment in the Republic of Malta
- » NEWSLETTER: SIPP opportunities, new investment challenges for IFAs and delays in SSAS registration
- April (3)
- March (6)
- » Thin Capitalization in India
- » NEWSLETTER: Budget 2014: Important changes to pensions
- » QROPS BULLETIN - MARCH 2014
- » NEWSLETTER: Reallocation of assets/Beware if setting up a new scheme to beat the end of the tax year/UK pensions for non-UK residents
- » INSIGHT SIPP
- » Important Things about Home Insurance it is Imperative You Know
- February (8)
- » Murdoch and News Corp Receive $882m Australian Tax Rebate
- » Tom Perkins Believes that Taxes will lead to 'Economic Extinction' of the 1%
- » Weariness of Refund Fraud Heightens as Tax Season Returns
- » QROPS BULLETIN - FEBRUARY 2014
- » NEWSLETTER: CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON 6TH APRIL 2014
- » International Civil Fraud - Cyprus
- » New Online Pension Products And Services For Advisers
- » DFM Platform SIPP
- January (3)
- 2013
- December (1)
- November (6)
- October (6)
- » Seminar Invitation: QROPS/QNUPS/IHT Implications/New Platform/Fund Management and Online SIPP
- » Cyprus: Does the Boomerang Really Come Back Sometimes?
- » QROPS BULLETIN: OCTOBER 2013
- » The Importance of Planning
- » Why Malta?
- » NEWSLETTER: Protection update and more reasons why everyone needs to save more
- September (1)
- August (4)
- July (7)
- June (6)
- » Incentives for Third Country Nationals to Invest in Cyprus - Significant Improvements
- » QROPS BULLETIN: JUNE 2013
- » Introducing the ACORN LITE SIPP for Regulated Investments & Bank Accounts
- » Inheritance Tax U-Turn: Expats Must Plan Ahead
- » Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on the Rights of Depositors
- » Newsletter - June 2013
- May (7)
- April (3)
- March (7)
- » Return to 120% of GAD and ensuring SSASs are properly run
- » QROPS for Financial Advisers QROPS Choice
- » Forming a company in Monaco
- » Increase in Minimum Annual Tax Burden in Luxembourg and Restructuring Solution
- » Announcing the Launch of an Isle of Man QNUPS
- » Monaco Residency - easy process?
- » Why consider Monaco?
- February (11)
- » UK Publishes Draft Legislation on Offshore Companies Which Own UK Property
- » New 'Approved Manager' Regulations for Hedge Funds
- » Announcing the Launch of a Guernsey QNUPS
- » Changing Gears - Investment Funds in the British Virgin Islands are Moving from Strength to Strength
- » Asset Tracing Recovery Tools in the BVI
- » Depardieu, taxes and untrodden paths
- » Why you Should Choose the BVI for your Fund
- » Fast and Simple in BVI
- » Guide to Incorporating Companies in the BVI
- » QROPS: An Overview of Jurisdictional Differences
- » QNUPS: An Overview of Jurisdictional Differences
- January (7)
- » New Modifications to the Commercial Code
- » QROPS BULLETIN: JANUARY
- » Why isn't offshore dying?
- » Laws part of the Memorandum agreed for financial assistance to be provided by the Troika voted by Cyprus Parliament
- » The Autumn Statement 2012
- » Dubai - Property ownership through company structures
- » Money Laundering
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (7)
- » The Cyprus International Trusts
- » Increase in minimum annual tax burden in Luxembourg
- » Panama's Banking Center Reports Almost 12% Growth in Assets
- » Why do business in Bulgaria?
- » Setting up an LLC in Dubai
- » BVI Law Holds Even Keel Between Rights of Investors and Rights of Mutual Funds
- » A CHOICE OF NEW SIPPS
- October (8)
- » Offshore Companies Owning UK Residential Property Need To Take Urgent Action
- » QROPS BULLETIN OCTOBER
- » Announcing the Launch of the QROPS TRANSIT SIPP
- » Unisex GAD rates and a new service for defined benefit schemes
- » Will Cyprus collapse?
- » ARBITRATION AS EXPEDITED OPTION FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
- » Incentives for third country nationals to invest in Cyprus
- » Insight SIPP For Sophisticated Investors
- September (6)
- » Property in SIPP/SSAS and Death Benefit Trap
- » QROPS Bulletin September
- » Panama - Training, Tax Deductible
- » NEWSLETTER: SIPP cash rates, Unisex GAD rates, annuity rates worsen even more - and opportunities for IFAs!
- » SIPP / SSAS: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MATTERS
- » SIPP / SSAS: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MATTERS
- August (12)
- » QROPS BULLETIN
- » NEWSLETTER: Warnings for SSASs and those with Enhanced/Fixed Protection, property and illiquidity issues and the true costs of pensions
- » Form a Singapore Company
- » Offshore Companies Owning Uk Residential Property Need To Take Urgent Action
- » U.S. Law Jeopardizes the Panamanian Banking Secrecy
- » The Professional's Toolkit Shelf Companies
- » Weathering the storm
- » Funds article for New Europe
- » Bearer shares: are their days numbered?
- » QROPS BULLETIN August
- » Incorporation In Hong Kong
- » A gateway to the booming Asian market
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (6)
- » Trusts & Foundations - The Best Tools for Giving...
- » NEWSLETTER: Pensions post 6.4.12 – the new Rules explained
- » Why you should consider Switzerland as part of your international tax planning arrangements?
- » A Different Style : VISTA Trusts 8 years later
- » Securities and investment business regulations in the British Virgin Islands
- » VAT Yacht Leasing Scheme
- March (4)
- February (1)
- January (7)
- » Cyprus Hydrocarbons Exploration and Exploitation: the Legal Framework and Licensing for hydrocarbon reserves in Cyprus' Exclusive Economic Zone
- » Cyprus Investment Firms
- » Outward Investment from Canada - The Offshore Perspective
- » Trade Marks in Cyprus: Registration, Protection and Infringement of Trade Marks and Community Trade Marks in Cyprus
- » The Document Keeping Requirement
- » The Professional's Toolkit - Shelf Companies
- » International Financial Centre Profile
- 2011
- December (3)
- October (5)
- September (2)
- August (5)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (6)
- » QROPS / QNUPS: Jurisdictional differences matter to Clients
- » Panama Pacifico: Gateway to the Americas
- » Income Tax Implications for Non-Residents Investing in Canadian Real Estate
- » QROPS Bulletin May 2011
- » QROPS Proposition: SIPP Specialists Hold a Unique Market Position
- » QROPS: Choice of Jurisdictions on Isle of Man
- April (3)
- March (4)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (2)
- October (1)
- May (3)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2009
- October (1)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- April (1)
- January (1)
- 2008
- November (1)
- September (1)
- July (1)
- 2007
- 2006
- 2005
- September (1)
- June (1)
- 2004
- April (1)
- 2003
- 2002
- August (1)
- June (1)
- May (1)
- 2001
- June (1)
- May (1)
- March (1)
- 2000
- November (1)
- October (1)
Event Listings
Listings for the leading worldwide conferences and events in accounting, investment, banking and finance, transfer pricing, corporate taxation and more...See Event Listings »