GENERAL
For
a number of reasons, non-resident investors have
been a major factor in many facets of the Canadian
real estate marketplace for many years.
Like
most major countries, Canada taxes
non-residents on income earned from the rental
of real estate within its borders, as well as
on gains realized on the sale of such real estate.
In general, Canada's tax treaties allow it unrestricted right to tax such income in the
hands of non-residents.
RENTAL
INCOME
The
Canadian taxation of real estate rental income
earned by a non-resident will vary depending on
whether or not the rental activities are considered
to be a business. In the case of rental income
earned by an individual (which will include a
natural person as well as a trust or estate) rental
activities will not normally be considered to
constitute a business unless services are provided that go beyond those
normally associated with a rental activity. On
that basis, the ownership and operation of an
apartment building by a non-resident individual
will not normally be considered a business; whereas
the ownership and operation of a hotel will.
In
the case of a corporation, there is a general
presumption in Canadian tax law that all activities
of a corporation constitute a business. In the
case of rental activities, an exception might
be the rental of real estate to a single tenant
under a “net/net” lease.
Under
the assumption that the rental activities do not
constitute a business, a non-resident in receipt
of rental income derived from real property situated
in Canada will
have the option of paying Canadian tax under two
methods:
- The
gross rents method, or
- The
net income method
This
choice must be made from year to year, and there
is no prohibition on switching the method used
from one year to another.
Gross
Rents Method
Under
this method, the tax paid (under Part XIII of
the Income Tax Act-“the Act”) is equal
to 25% of the gross rents. For this purpose, based
upon a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision
in 1968, it would appear that gross rents must
include property taxes paid directly by the tenant
to the municipality.
This
25% rate is not reduced under the latest versions
of any of Canada's tax treaties.
No
Canadian tax return need be filed under this method,
and tax should be withheld and remitted by the
tenant or agent.
It
should be understood that, in the absence of a
timely filing of a Canadian tax return under section
216 of the Act (as discussed below) the non-resident
would be required to pay tax using the gross rents
method. This will be the case even if there is
no net income after expenses are deducted.
Net
Income Method (Section 216)
In
lieu of paying Canadian tax on gross rents under
Part XIII, a non-resident may elect, instead,
to pay tax under Part I of the Act, on the net
income. In the case of natural persons and estates,
tax will be calculated using graduated tax rates
similar to those that apply to Canadian residents.
Provincial income taxes will generally not be
payable for such individual; however, in lieu
thereof a special federal surtax will apply. The
end result, based on 2004 rates, is that a combined
tax rate of 23.68% will apply to income up to
$35,000. However, the rate increases to a point
where the marginal tax rate is 42.92% on income
over $113.804.
In
the case of corporations, federal taxes at a rate
of 32.12% will apply regardless of the level of
taxable income.
In
the case of corporations earning non-business
rental income in Ontario, Ontario corporation
income taxes (at a rate of 14%) will also apply
to the net income (regardless of which of the
two methods are used for federal purposes). Notwithstanding
that fact, the 10% “provincial abatement” normally
provided by the federal government will not apply.
As
a general rule, a Canadian tax return must be
filed within 2 years from the end of the relevant
year to use this method.
However,
if a form NR6 (undertaking to file a Canadian
tax return) is filed in order to reduce tax withheld
at source, the return
must be filed within 6 months from the end of
the relevant year to use this method.
Rental
losses may not be carried over to other years
on a section 216 return.
Rental
Activities That Constitute a Business
In
cases where the rental activities constitute a
business carried on in Canada, the non-resident will be required to pay tax on the net income derived
from such activities under Part I of the Act.
The gross rents method will not be available.
In
such situations, there is no requirement for withholding
tax to be remitted to the taxation authorities.
In
the case of non-resident individuals, provincial
income taxes will be payable instead of the federal
surtax that normally applies where a return is
filed under section 216 of the Act.
Corporate
taxes at a federal rate of 22.12% will apply where
the non-resident is a corporation. In addition,
corporation taxes will be payable to the province
in which the real estate is located-in Ontario the rate
is 14%. Furthermore, “branch profits tax” under
Part XIV of the Act will also apply. In general
terms, this tax is equal to 25% of the profits
earned each year after deducting normal federal
and provincial income taxes as well as an “investment
allowance” relating to the cost of assets remaining
in the business in Canada. If the corporation
is resident in a country with which Canada has
a tax treaty, the 25% rate will usually be reduced
(to as low as 5%) and some exemption may be available.
Furthermore,
in situations where the rental activities constitute
a business, resulting losses may generally be
carried back for up to 3 years and forward for
up to 7 years (to be increased to 10 under proposed
amendments).
GAINS
FROM SALE
Canada taxes non-residents on taxable capital gains arising from the sale
(or other “disposition”) of “taxable Canadian
property” (“TCP”).
Since
interests in real estate situated in Canada are
included in the TCP definition, non-residents
who realize taxable capital gains from the disposition
of real estate will be subject to Canadian tax.
In
general terms, the amount of the “taxable capital
gain” is equal to 50% of the amount by which the
“proceeds of disposition” (e.g. sale price) exceeds
the total of the “adjusted cost base” of the property
plus costs entailed in making the disposition
(e.g. real estate commissions).
The
resulting taxable capital gain is included in
computing income and subject to tax at the relevant
tax rate. Since only 50% of capital gains are
included in income, the effective tax rate is
generally half the normal rate on income.
In
certain cases, a gain from the sale of real estate
may be fully taxable business income, rather than
a capital gain. This will be the case, for example,
where the taxpayer is engaged in a business of
developing real estate for sale. It will also
be the case even if the real estate was acquired
as part of an isolated speculative transaction
in order to resell it at a profit (an “adventure
or concern in the nature of trade”).
In
cases where a portion of the sale price is not
yet due at the end of the year of sale, Canadian
tax law normally allows a “reserve” to be claimed
under which the recognition of an appropriate
portion of the taxable capital gains is deferred.
However, the claiming of such a reserve is not
permitted where the taxpayer in question is a
non-resident.
None
of Canada's
tax treaties preclude it from levying tax on gains
from the disposition of Canadian real estate.
However, Canada's
treaties with the United
States
and the Netherlands contain “fresh start” rules under which gains accrued prior to certain
dates in the 1980s will be exempt from Canadian
tax.
INDIRECT
INTERESTS
In
certain cases, indirect interests in Canadian
real estate (i.e. interests held through corporations,
partnerships, or trusts) may also constitute TCP.
As such, capital gains realized by non-residents
on the disposition of their interests in such
entities will be subject to Canadian tax under
the Act.
For
example, shares in corporations resident in Canada will
always be TCP unless they are listed on a prescribed
stock exchange. Even shares of non-resident corporations
will be TCP if most of the underlying value is
attributable to Canadian real estate.
However,
under the provisions of many of Canadian tax treaties,
Canada will be precluded from taxing gains realized by residents of the relevant
jurisdiction on certain types of TCP. For example,
under Canada's
tax treaty with the United
States,
Canada would
generally be precluded from taxing U.S. residents
on capital gains from the disposition of shares
of corporations not resident in Canada, even if most of the value of such shares is attributable to underlying
Canadian real estate. In addition, in certain
cases (e.g. Canada's
tax treaty with Barbados) gains from the disposition of shares in real estate holding corporation
may only be taxed if the Canadian real estate
is directly held by that corporation-if it is
held by a subsidiary of that corporation, Canada may
not tax the gain. In addition, under certain treaties
(e.g. Canada's tax treaty with the United Kingdom),
Canada may not tax gains from the disposition
of shares in corporation if the underlying value
is mainly attributable to real estate used in
a business (other than a rental business) of that
corporation.
TAX
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS AND WITHHOLDING
In
the absence of obtaining a tax clearance from
the Canada Revenue Agency, a person acquiring
TCP from a non-resident is obliged to remit amounts
on account of that non-resident's tax. In certain
cases, an additional requirement will apply in
connection with Quebec taxation authorities
where the property is real estate situated in
the Province of Quebec.
As
a general rule, the amount of tax that must be
remitted in the absence of a tax clearance is
25% of the purchase price. However, where the
property is “depreciable property” (e.g. the building
component of the real estate) or real estate inventory,
the rate is 50%.
In
order to obtain a clearance, the vendor must pay
or post security for 25% of the amount by which
the sale price exceeds the adjusted cost base
of the property. Furthermore, where “capital cost
allowance” (i.e. the Canadian tax equivalent of
depreciation) has been claimed additional amounts
may be required. Normally, the amount paid or
posted exceeds the actual tax liability that will
be calculated when the tax return is filed. This
is because of the fact that the rate of tax generally
exceeds the actual effective tax rate, as well
as the fact that “costs of disposition” (e.g.
sales commissions) may not be deducted in computing
the amount required to obtain the clearance, whereas
they are allowed in computing the capital gain
when the return is filed.
DEEMED
DISPOSITION ON DEATH
In
cases where a non-resident holds an interest in
Canadian real estate (or other TCP) at the time
of his or her death, he or she will be deemed
to have disposed of such TCP immediately before
that time for proceeds of disposition equal to
the fair market value of such property.
Unlike
the situation where a Canadian resident dies,
there will generally be no “spousal rollover”
(i.e. deferral of capital gains where property
passes to a spouse) allowed on the death of a
non-resident. However, if the non-resident is
a U.S. resident,
the spousal rollover may be available as a result
of a special provision found in the Canada-U.S.
Tax Convention.
In
certain cases, proper planning may avoid exposure
to the Canadian taxation of capital gains on death.
For example, if the non-resident holds his or
her interest by means of an entity that is not
TCP (e.g. a partnership in which
interests in TCP represent a minority of
the value of its assets) Canadian tax liability
may be avoided. Other strategies might depend
on the application of the tax treaty between Canada and
the non-resident's country of residence to the
nature of the entity through which the real estate
is held.
|