LOWTAX.NET
CONTACT | ABOUT | LEGAL | LINKS     
   NETWORK SITES:
   LOWTAX   
   TAX-NEWS   

Jurisdiction Home Pages

Andorra
Anguilla
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Bahamas
Barbados
Belgium
Belize
Bermuda
Botswana
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Canada
Cayman Islands
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cyprus
Denmark
Dubai
France
Germany
Gibraltar
Greece
Grenada
Guernsey
Hong Kong
Ireland
Isle of Man
Jersey
Labuan
Latvia
Liberia

Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Madeira
Malaysia
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritius
Monaco
The Netherlands
The Netherlands Antilles
Nevis
New Zealand
Panama
Portugal
Russia
Seychelles
Singapore
South Africa
Spain
St. Kitts
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Switzerland
Turks & Caicos Islands
USA
UK
Vanuatu

Newsletter

To receive monthly updates on new features in lowtax.net and tax-news.com just enter your e-mail address below:

Daily Tax Quote

The Network

3,000 free pages of accurate, timely information

Tax-News.com


Daily, updated news about tax and offshore from our team of 20 international journalists

Lowtax.net

'Low-tax' business and investment in the top 50 jurisdictions covered in exceptional detail

Investors offshore.com


Global information and advice for expatriates and international investors

Offshore-e-com.com

A topical guide to offshore e-commerce focused on tax and regulation

LawAndTax-News.com


Daily news and background data on tax and legal developments for international business

>
LOWTAX OFFSHORE

SWITZERLAND: DOUBLE TAX TREATIES


<

BACK TO SWITZERLAND INFORMATION: BUSINESS, TAXATION AND OFFSHORE

On this Page:

- SWITZERLAND DOUBLE-TAX TREATIES
- SWITZERLAND TABLE OF TREATY RATES
- SWITZERLAND OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS


Switzerland Double-Tax Treaties

Switzerland has Double Taxation Treaties with about 70 other countries. The general effect of the treaties for non-residents from treaty countries is that they can obtain a partial or total refund of tax withheld by the Swiss paying agent. Although the full amount of withholding tax is deducted at source the difference can be re-claimed by the non resident from the Swiss tax authorities. Where there is no double taxation treaty in place withholding taxes deducted in the foreign jurisdiction on remittances paid to a Swiss entity give rise to a tax credit in Switzerland.

No withholding tax is levied on royalties paid to foreign beneficiaries. Profits repatriated abroad by the Swiss branch of a foreign company do not attract withholding taxes irrespective of any double taxation treaty.

Treaty abuse: A repayment of withholding taxes under the terms of a treaty will be denied where there has been "abuse". Abuse occurs when a foreign-controlled legal entity which is resident in Switzerland fails one of the 4 following tests:

  • The entity must have a reasonable debt/equity ratio (generally the total of all interest-bearing loans should not exceed 6 times the company's equity);
  • The entity must not pay excessive interest rates on debt (for the purposes of this test the accepted rate varies from time to time);
  • The entity must not pay more than 50% of its income as management fees, interest or royalties to non residents;
  • The entity must distribute at least 25% of the income which could be distributed as dividend.

Where any one of the 4 tests are failed the portion of withholding tax deducted and which is deemed refundable under the terms of the treaty is not refunded.

Additionally, treaty provisions do not apply to dividends, interest or royalties paid by a Swiss entity to a German, Italian, French or Belgian entity if the Swiss entity is wholly or partly exempt from cantonal tax under the tax incentives applicable to specific types of company (i.e. domiciliary, holding, auxiliary, mixed and service companies). See Offshore Legal and Tax Regime.

The following are some of the countries which have double-tax treaties with Switzerland:

  • Albania
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Belgium
  • Belarus
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • China
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iran
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Ivory Coast
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kirghistan
  • Kuwait
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macedonia
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • Moldova
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Russia
  • Serbia
  • Singapore
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • South Africa
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sweden
  • Tajikistan
  • Thailand
  • Trinidad & Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkmenistan
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Uzbekistan
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam

In January 2007, Switzerland and Japan agreed to take up bilateral negotiations regarding an economic partnership and free trade agreement. A joint study group whose aim it is to strengthen economic relations between Switzerland and Japan had, over the previous twelve months, undertaken a feasibility study at the official level of a comprehensive economic partnership and free trade agreement between Switzerland and Japan. In its report, the study group concluded that such an agreement would significantly enhance bilateral economic relations (trade in goods, services, investment), and could strengthen the competitiveness of firms in both countries. Japan is Switzerland's third most important trade partner (after the EU and the USA).

Also in January 2007, Federal Councillor Doris Leuthard signed the EFTA Free Trade Agreement with Egypt and reported that "considerable progress" has been made in negotiations regarding a free trade agreement between the EFTA States and Canada. EFTA ministers have also met with the Indonesian Minister of Trade to discuss the feasibility of a comprehensive trade agreement. The other EFTA members include Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

In February 2007, Ms Leuthard, who heads the Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), led a Swiss business delegation to Brazil with the aim of improving access to the Brazilian market for Swiss products and investment. The visit was expected lead to the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding between Switzerland and Brazil, and the creation of a Joint Economic Commission. Brazil is one of the few countries with which Switzerland has so far had neither an investment protection agreement nor a double taxation convention.

A protocol to the double taxation convention between the United Kingdom and Switzerland was signed in London on 26 June 2007.

The protocol will make some amendments to the existing double taxation convention, dated 8 December 1977. The main amendments are the elimination of taxation at source on dividends, where the beneficial owner of the dividends has a substantial participation in the payer or is a pension scheme.

The protocol also amends the exchange of information article. It provides that, in future, information will be exchanged in cases of tax fraud or the like, and in cases involving holding companies.

Measures are also contained in the new protocol relating to pensions. In future, lump sum payments may be taxed only by the state in which they arise. Also, pension contributions paid to a scheme recognised for tax purposes in one country may, under certain conditions, be deductible in the other country.

BACK TO TOP


Switzerland Table of Treaty Rates

The rates shown are those of withholding taxes applied to payments made by Swiss entities or persons to non-resident entities or persons; a zero rate applies to royalties.

Country
Dividends, %
Interest, %
Paid from Switzerland
Paid from Switzerland
Australia
15
10
Austria
5
5
Belgium
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Bulgaria
5/15 (Note 1)
10
Canada
15
15
China
10
10
Denmark
nil
nil
Egypt
5/15 (Note 1)
15
Finland
5/10 (Note 2)
nil
France
5 (Note 3)
10
Germany
10/30 (Note 4)
nil
Greece
5
10
Hungary
10
10
Iceland
5/15 (Note 1)
nil
Indonesia
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Ireland
nil/10 (Note 1)
nil
Italy
15
12.5
Japan
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Luxembourg
nil/15 (Note 1)
10
Malaysia
5/15 (Note 1)
10
Netherlands
nil/15 (Note 1)
5
New Zealand
15
10
Norway
10/15 (Note1)
nil
Pakistan
15/35 (Note 5)
15/35 (Note 6)
Poland
5/15 (Note1)
10
Portugal
10/15 (Note1)
10
Singapore
10/15 (Note 1)
10
South Africa
7.5
35
South Korea
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Spain
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Sri Lanka
10/15 (Note 1)
10
Sweden
nil/15 (Note 7)
5
Trinidad & Tobago
10?20 (Note 8)
10
UK
5/15 (Note 1)
nil
USA
5/15 (Note 1)
5

Notes:

(1)



The higher rate applies if the payment is received by a company holding directly less than 25% of the capital of the Swiss paying company

(2)
5% if the recipient is a company
(3)
Only 20% is refunded (making the effective rate 15%) if non residents of France have substantial interests in the recipient company, if the recipient company controls at least 20% of the Swiss company and if the shares of either company are neither quoted at a stock exchange nor traded over the counter
(4)
The 30% rate applies to dividends from jouissance rights, participating loans and silent participations. Withholding tax shall not exceed the tax chargeable on the profits out of which the dividends are paid.
(5)
The lower rate applies if the recipient is a company which owns at least one third of the voting stock in the Swiss company
(6)

If the recipient is an individual no refund of the Swiss 35% withholding tax is granted

(7)

The zero rate applies where the payer is a corporate shareholder which has a participation of at least 25% for a continuous period of at least 2 years immediately preceding the distribution. 5% applies where the participation requirement is satisfied but not for the requisite period and 15% is the rate for smaller holdings.

(8)
The lower rate applies if the recipient is a company which controls directly or indirectly at least 10% of the voting power in the Swiss paying corporation

BACK TO TOP


Switzerland Other International Agreements

Switzerland has passed its own mutual assistance law, and is also a party to a number of international mutual assistance treaties, some multilateral and some bilateral, including the following:

  • The European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, 1959;
  • Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters with the USA, 1973;
  • The Federal Act on International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, 1983, as amended in 1997;
  • The European Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds of Crime, 1993.

The Federal Act, particularly since the 1997 amendments, enables the transmission of documents and information abroad for the purposes of criminal proceedings. From the point of view of banking secrecy the following can be said about the current situation:

  • According to a recent decision of the Federal Supreme Court the transmission of such information requires the permission of the Swiss police authorities who must inform the customer about the order and give him a right to appeal;
  • It is not permitted to forward information on persons who are not the subject matter of the investigation;
  • Information will not be given if
    • The foreign authorities might use the information for purposes other than those for which it was requested;
    • The offence alleged is not equally punishable in Switzerland;
    • The requesting state does not offer Switzerland reciprocal treatment in these matters;
    • The offence is related to tax, politics or military matters.

The Swiss authorities now grant administrative assistance as well as judicial assistance. Administrative assistance is regulator to regulator contact as opposed to judicial assistance which takes place between judicial authorities within the scope of civil or criminal legal proceedings.

The Swiss Federal Banking Commission which regulates banks, mutual funds, stock exchanges and security dealers is the regulator charged with rendering administrative assistance. A number of conditions attach to the granting of administrative assistance by the Swiss Federal Banking Commission namely:

  • The foreign authority must be recognized by the Commission as a supervisory authority authorized to request administrative assistance;
  • The foreign authority may only use the information for the purposes of direct supervision of the institution concerned;
  • The foreign authority must be bound by official or professional secrecy;
  • The foreign body can only re-transmit the information under very restrictive circumstances. This is called the principle of specificity and means that information that was given for the purposes of a criminal offence such as drug dealing cannot be used in proceedings for tax evasion. In practice the foreign authority must confirm that it will not so transmit the information unless required to do so by a competent court against whose decision it will appeal. Since the grant of assistance by the commission is discretionary if specificity cannot or was not guaranteed future assistance may be denied though in practice the commission is always eager to be seeing to play its part;
  • If the information requested gives the name of a client he must be notitfied and given time to contest the decision;
  • There is a right of appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

In 2001 the European Union began negotiations with Switzerland to attempt to gain agreement to the information-sharing required as part of the EU's withholding tax directive and without which it will not be effective.

Switzerland was politely helpful, offering to extend its 35% withholding tax on resident savings income to non-resident account holders, and to distribute much of the tax collected among EU member states, but the government was adamant that it will not shift on the issue of banking secrecy. The Finance Minister, Kaspar Villiger confirmed this, commenting frequently that: 'Banking secrecy is not negotiable'.

Jean-Baptiste Zufferey, a Swiss tax expert and professor at the University of Fribourg expresses the situation more bluntly: 'It's not because we fear banks would lose business, but most Swiss people have an attachment to the idea that a human being is entitled to financial privacy. It is the problem of foreign countries if they cannot tax their citizens. We in Switzerland don't have to help other countries do their job.'

This posed a serious problem for the EU - not just because the alpine jurisdiction is home an estimated one third of the world's offshore wealth, but because other countries, in particular Luxembourg and Austria, had said that they would refuse to back information exchange plans if Switzerland does not participate. The EU had set the end of 2002 as the deadline for final adoption of its information exchange plans, but Luxembourg's refusal to accept the Swiss compromise position as acceptable meant that negotiations continued into 2003. After last-minute haggling by Italy and Belgium, it was agreed by mid-2003 that the Directive would enter into force in 2005.

The Swiss banking fraternity certainly doesn't admit to any regulatory weaknesses, and is up in arms about what it sees as incorrect foreign attitudes towards Swiss banking. “We cannot have a situation where people claim that in Switzerland, control weaknesses supposedly keep occurring,” Urs Roth, chief executive of the Swiss Bankers Association told an August, 2003 seminar.

"Where Switzerland has excessive regulation compared with the foreign competition, nothing is done about it. In the long run this may produce a widening gap that could be very damaging for our banks and therefore our economy," warned Roth.

In January, 2004, Switzerland and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development reached a long-awaited compromise deal over certain Swiss tax practices deemed harmful by the OECD. Following two days of discussions with the Paris-based organisation’s fiscal affairs committee, Swiss officials agreed to exchange information with other countries on Swiss holding companies, one of a number of issues that has dogged the relationship between Switzerland and the OECD in recent years.

Wilhelm Jaggi, Switzerland's ambassador to the OECD, stated that the agreement represents a “good and balanced solution for all sides." However, he was keen to emphasise that the issue remains entirely separate from the more delicate matter of banking confidentiality.

The two parties also managed to resolve another sticking point involving the issue of administrative notes on how taxable profits are defined by firms. But a third tax issue concerned with the method by which commercial expenses are deducted from tax statements remains unresolved.

Further agreement was reached, however, in the area of transfer-pricing, and the Swiss authorities have agreed to warn domestic firms to abide by OECD guidelines when transferring profits to subsidiary companies.

It has also emerged that the OECD is to undertake further analysis of the tax regimes under which Swiss finance and leasing companies operate.

In May, 2004, agreement was provisionally reached with Switzerland over the implementation of the EU Savings Tax Directive. The Swiss government had agreed the text of the Directive, but refused to sign it until assurances were given by the European authorities that the Schengen agreement on cross-border crime would not force it to compromise its banking secrecy by reporting on tax evasion, which is not a crime in Switzerland.

The agreed compromise is that Switzerland will provide legal assistance under the terms of the Schengen agreement in cases relating to indirect taxes such as customs, VAT, and alcohol and tobacco levies, but will be exempted from providing such assistances in cases of direct taxation.

Later in the month, representatives from Switzerland and the European Union signed the nine 'bilaterals II' agreements covering various topics including tax and the free movement of people. They had been held up pending agreement on the Savings Tax Directive.

The agreements concern: the taxation of savings; co-operation in the fight against fraud; the association of Switzerland to the Schengen acquis; participation of Switzerland in the “Dublin” and “Eurodac” regulations; trade in processed agricultural products; Swiss participation in the European Environment Agency and European Environment Information & Observation Network (EIONET); statistical co-operation; Swiss participation in the Media plus and Media training programs; and the avoidance of double taxation for pensioners of the Community institutions.

A protocol to the existing agreement on the free movement of persons was also signed, extending the agreement to the new EU Member States.

Right wing parties such as the Swiss People's Party, opposed to the plans to cooperate more closely with Brussels on security and other matters, threatened to force a referendum on the issue, but by November it was clear that the government was going to be able to put through the necessary implementing legislation with needing a referendum, and the Savings Tax Directive duly came into force in July, 2005, with Switzerland applying a 15% withholding tax to the returns on savings of EU residents.

The new Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the the European Commission and certain member states of the European Free Trade Area, which includes Switzerland, was signed on October 30, 2007.

The new agreement aims to align the Convention provisions with the present European Community legal framework. As a result of it, the rules for determining jurisdiction of the courts will now be similar in the EU and the EFTA States concerned. Moreover, the judgments delivered by EU national courts and those of EFTA Member States will be more easily recognised and enforced.

In November 2007, The Swiss Federal Council approved bilateral framework agreements with the eight European Union member states which acceded to the EU in 2004.

It was announced at the end of 2007, that Switzerland has given Malta EUR1.8 million, under the bilateral agreement which implements Switzerland’s undertaking to provide cohesion funds to the new member states of the EU, following its access to the EU internal market.

The individual bilateral agreements by Switzerland with the ten EU member states which joined in 2004 follow the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Switzerland and the Council of the European Union in February 2006.

This MoU contained the overall conditions and modalities agreed between Switzerland and the EU for a financial contribution by Switzerland as a compensatory measure to the latter’s participation in the economic and social dimensions of the EU internal market.

BACK TO TOP

<

BACK TO SWITZERLAND INFORMATION: BUSINESS, TAXATION AND OFFSHORE

THE LOWTAX LIBRARY

One of the web's largest and most authoritative business and investment information sources. Alongside topical, daily news on worldwide tax developments, you can receive weekly newswires or access up-to-date intelligence reports on a range of legal, tax and investment subjects.

FREE TRIAL NEWS SUBSCRIPTION

Our 16 constantly updated intelligence reports cover every important aspect of 'offshore' and international tax-planning in depth, including banking secrecy, the EU's savings tax directive, offshore funds, e-commerce, offshore gaming and transfer pricing. Reports are available for immediate downloading or as subscription services with news pages.

Advertising & Marketing

With over 50,000 qualified readers every month our web-sites offer a number of cost effective, targeted advertising, sponsorship and marketing opportunities:

Display advertising - from 'skyscrapers' to 'buttons'
Content/article submission and sponsorship
Opt-in email marketing
On-line Services Directory listings

Click here to learn more or contact Peter Wiggins on +44 1424 425933 or email him at peter@lowtax.net

News & Content Solutions

Could your corporate web-site or newsletter benefit from incorporating regularly updated news and content tailored to serve your clients' interests? We can provide a variety of maintenance-free news and content solutions that can be seamlessly integrated and dynamically delivered:

Customised, personalised 'own-brand' news services
Newsletter content and management
News Headlines Tickers

Click here to learn more or contact Peter Wiggins on +44 1424 425933 or email him at peter@lowtax.net

IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE LOWTAX NETWORK has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments. All materials on this site copyright THE LOWTAX NETWORK 1999 to 2009. Contact us for further information.