Banking,
especially private banking, is Liechtenstein's
flagship financial service, although its
trust regime, modelled on common law precedents,
is unique among civil law jurisdictions,
and is widely used. The variety and great
flexibility of the corporate forms available
in Liechtenstein, coupled with excellent
tax-saving possibilities, has encouraged
an inflow of holding and investment management
companies. See Offshore
Legal and Tax Regimes for details.
Early figures suggested that the EU's Savings
Tax Directive, which forced Liechtenstein
to impose a withholding tax on returns from
savings paid to citizens of EU Member States,
has had little impact on the country's highly
successful private banking sector.
The
administration has recently been developing
legislation for captive insurance and collective
investment sectors.
By
the end of the third quarter 2007 (the most
recent figures available at the time of
writing), a total of 35 insurance undertakings
were domiciled in Liechtenstein. The direct
insurance companies operate almost exclusively
pursuant to the free movement of services
in the EEA area and Switzerland.
A
Law on Asset Management (Asset Management
Act, AMA) entered into force on 1 January
2006. This Act lays the foundation for asset
management companies as new, internationally
recognized financial intermediaries. The
Financial Markets Authority supervises implementation
of the Asset Management Act and related
ordinances as well as compliance with regulations.
At
the end of the third quarter 2007 there
were 63 fund management companies and 379
investment funds operating in Liechtenstein.
At the end of 2006 assets under management
in Liechtenstein stood at CHF 219.4 billion,
20% higher than a year earlier.
This
section of the
site describes the most important types
of offshore business activity carried out
from the island.
BACK
TO TOP
Liechtenstein International
Holding Companies
The structure of Liechtenstein company and
tax legislation makes it a very suitable
place in which to base various types of
holding company. See Offshore
Legal and Tax Regimes for a more
detailed description of tax aspects of holding
companies. They are exempt from most normal
taxes.
In
Liechtenstein, a holding company is recognised
as such, but does not have a special legal
form: it can take any of the forms permitted
under the Law on persons and Companies 1926
(PGR Code), including a company limited
by shares, a private limited company, a
foundation, a trust enterprise (not a trust)
or an establishment (see Types
of Company).
The
objects of holding companies are described
in the tax legislation as 'exclusively or
predominantly the management of assets,
participation in other enterprises, or the
permanent management of holdings in other
enterprises'. Holding companies are permitted
to own and manage movable and immovable
property whether inside or outside Liechtenstein,
including real estate and the various types
of intellectual property.
BACK
TO TOP
Liechtenstein Trade Marketing
and Distribution
Situated in the centre of the EU, but not
being part of it, and with a well-developed
banking sector, not to mention the presence
of Switzerland alongside, Liechtenstein's
offshore taxation regime is very inviting
to companies with cross-border European
trading, marketing and distribution operations.
The
'domiciliary' entity is suited to external
trading operations. It is not a separate
corporate form as such, but is a status
that can be adopted by any of the corporate
forms permitted by the PGR Code, including
the company limited by shares, the private
limited company, the foundation, the trust
enterprise (not the trust) and the establishment
(see Forms of Company).
Domiciliary
companies are defined as 'juridical persons.
. . . . which have only their domicile in
Liechtenstein whether an office is kept
or not and carrying on no commercial or
trading activities in the country'. They
are largely exempt from local taxes. See
Offshore Legal and
Tax Regimes for further details of their
taxation.
In
practice, the tax authorities intepret the
legislation very flexibly, as long as a
domiciliary company doesn't use its tax
advantages to compete against local, more
highly taxed companies. Thus, the domiciliary
company can have an office from which it
manages import/export operations, purchase
services, employ free-lance agents who act
as local sales-people for foreign customers,
etc.
Along
with other offshore jurisdictions, Liechtenstein
is a suitable place in which to base e-commerce
services for retail or wholesale distribution
of material or non-material goods: see Offshore-e-com.com
for extended descriptions of how such businesses
can take advantage of the combination of
offshore and e-commerce.
BACK
TO TOP
Liechtenstein
Banking
A substantial banking sector has developed
in Liechtenstein, particularly in private
banking, due to a combination of factors,
including a relatively relaxed but still
highly respected regulatory regime, the
very flexible company legislation, and strict
banking privacy.
The
Liechtenstein banking sector is regulated
under the Law on Banks and Finance Companies
1993; this law was substantially amended
following Liechtenstein's entry into the
EEA in 1995, through the Law on Banks and
Finance Companies 1998. The Act concerning
Banks and Savings Funds 1960 imposes heavy
penalties for breaches of professional secrecy.
Other recent legislation dealt with due
diligence on the part of bankers accepting
deposits or assets, installing 'know your
customer' rules.
The
"know your customer" system is
legally compulsory (and has been since October
2000) for all banks that belong to the Liechtenstein
Bankers' Association. This means that banks
in Liechtenstein, previously known as one
of Europe's most secretive tax havens, can
no longer guarantee anonymity for new and
existing account holders, although further
account details will remain under normal
banking secrecy agreements.
Liechtenstein private banks are able to
offer highly tax-efficient asset management
services to clients, using one or other
of the forms available under the PGR Code,
so that income received in Liechtenstein
from international assets can be forwarded
or reinvested with minimal or no local taxation.
According
to the most recent figures available at
the time of writing, Liechtenstein's banks
managed some SFr171.5bn in clients assets
(which equates to a staggering SFr5m for
every man, woman and child in the principality).
In
March, 2006, Prince
Alois, ruler of the Principality, stated
that Liechtenstein was unlikely to dispense
with its coveted banking secrecy laws any
time soon because such a measure would probably
not be approved if put to a referendum.
In
2008, the banking sector became the centre
of an international row over tax evasion,
which was sparked by the
use by German taxpayers of Liechtenstein
entities to duck their tax liabilities in
their home country.
The
scandal first broke after it emerged that
the home of Klaus Zumwinkel, Chief Executive
of Deutsche Post, one of Germany's largest
companies, had been raided by police as
part of a tax evasion investigation. He
was accused of hiding about EUR1 million
from German tax collectors in Liechtenstein.
Zumwinkel
was subsequently forced to resign by Deutsche
Post, but the affair did not end there.
On Monday, it was reported that several
more homes and offices in the Frankfurt
area and in southern Germany have been raided,
after the intelligence services received
information from a former employee of a
Liechtenstein bank about hundreds of wealthy
German clients.
The
informant, an ex-employee of LGT, Liechtenstein's
largest bank, was said to have handed over
a disc to the German intelligence service,
the BND, containing confidential information
on more than 1,000 clients. The BND was
believed to have paid the informant a sum
of between EUR4 and EUR5 million for the
disc.
Following
the revelation, Prince Alois reiterated
his message that the jurisdiction would
continue to improve its financial sector
regulation, but that this would not come
at the expense of an erosion in individual
privacy.
"The
Liechtenstein financial centre has already
undertaken considerable reform efforts in
recent years, but more reforms will be necessary,
not only to ensure the competitiveness of
the financial centre for the future, but
also to enhance it," the Hereditary
Prince told Parliament.
"Other
financial centres have caught up by creating
new, attractive business environments, while
the international pressure has risen on
locations offering a high level of protection
of privacy," he observed.
The
scandal had repercussions throughout the
world, and in February 2008, US Senator
Carl Levin (D-MI), announced that he intended
to investigate whether US citizens may have
had dealings with the Liechtenstein bank
at the centre of the row over tax evasion
and offshore secrecy laws.
Levin,
who had long campaigned for legislation
to prevent Americans from moving money offshore,
recently revealed that the Senate Permanent
Committee on Investigations, which he chairs,
would launch a probe into reports that the
stolen computer disc containing details
of clients of Liechtenstein's LGT Bank also
included several American names.
It
also emerged that month that the Internal
Revenue Service had initiated enforcement
action involving more than 100 US taxpayers,
to ensure proper income reporting and tax
payment in connection with accounts in Liechtenstein.
The
national tax administrations of Australia,
Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, Sweden,
United Kingdom, and the United States of
America, all member countries of the OECD's
Forum on Tax Administration (FTA), had also
announced that they were working together,
following revelations that Liechtenstein
accounts were being used for tax avoidance
and evasion.
"Combating
off-shore tax avoidance and evasion are
high priorities for the IRS," explained
then IRS Acting Commissioner Linda Stiff.
“We
are determined to protect the United States
tax system from abuse and ensure that taxpayers
pay what they owe. We will use all our authority
to fairly and effectively enforce our tax
laws. It should be clear from recent events
that there is no safe hiding place for the
proceeds of tax avoidance and evasion. Anyone
with hidden income and gains would be well-advised
to make a prompt and complete disclosure
to the Internal Revenue Service," she
added.
The
arrival of President Obama in the White
House has seen the proposal of several anti-offshore
intiaitives, including the Foreign Account
Tax Compliance Act, which has given the
US Internal Revenue Service new tools to
"detect, deter and discourage offshore
tax abuses." The legislation, approved
by Congress in March 2010: imposes a 30%
withholding on US source payments to foreign
financial institutions, foreign trusts,
and foreign corporations that do not agree
to disclose their US account holders and
owners to the IRS; requires taxpayers to
disclose their foreign accounts on their
US tax returns; increases the statute of
limitations to six years for failure to
report certain offshore transactions and
income; clarifies when a foreign trust is
considered to have a US beneficiary; and
treats substitute dividend and dividend
equivalent payments to foreign persons as
dividends for purposes of US withholding.
In
August 2009, the UK government announced
details of the “groundbreaking”
disclosure agreement with Liechtenstein
that gives UK taxpayers with undisclosed
accounts in the Alpine jurisdiction the
opportunity to disclose income at a reduced
penalty, or face having their accounts shut
down.
The
so-called Liechtenstein Disclosure Facility
(LDF) agreement, signed by the two governments
on August 11 along with a broader Tax and
Information Exchange Agreement, will allow
penalties on unpaid tax to be capped at
10% of tax evaded over the last 10 years
providing that the account holder makes
a full disclosure to HM Revenue and Customs
(HMRC).
However,
those who do not make a full disclosure
by the end of the program, which runs from
September 1, 2009 to March 31, 2015, will
find their Liechtenstein accounts closed
down. They may also face penalties on any
unpaid tax of up to 100%.
BACK TO TOP
Liechtenstein Trust Management
As a civil law jurisdiction, Liechtenstein
did not have trust legislation, until it
was included in the PGR Code in 1926. This
far-sighted action has led to the development
of a thriving business in trust management;
although other local corporate forms offer
partial substitutes for the trust, it remains
a highly effective means of asset protection,
and non-anglo-saxon clients are often more
comfortable with Liechtenstein as a jurisdiction
than they might be with, for instance, an
ex-British colony. Unlike common law trusts,
Liechtenstein trusts can accumulate income,
and are subject to no rule against perpetuities.
The trust law generally is extremely flexible
as regards the powers of settlors (trustors).
As
long as the original trust documentation
is deposited with the Registrar of Trusts
within 12 months, there is no public information
about the trust, and later trust documention,
eg naming beneficiaries, does not have to
be deposited; the level of confidentiality
is therefore very good. Trust documents
can be in any language.
See
Law of Offshore
for details of the legal regime for trusts,
and see Offshore
Law and Taxation Regime for details
of their taxation.
BACK
TO TOP