Guernsey
Table of Statutes
This is a non-exhaustive list of the main Guernsey
statutes affecting offshore and non-resident
business. The statutes are listed in alphabetical
order click on the statute for a fuller
description of the statute or the legal regime
it forms part of:
Banking Supervision (Bailiwick of Guernsey)
(Amendment) Law, 2003
Collective Investment Scheme Rules 1988
Companies (Guernsey)
Law 1994
Company Security
(Insider Dealing) (Guernsey) Law 1996
Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Regulations, 2002
Financial
Services Commission (Guernsey) Law 1986
Gambling (Betting)
(Alderney) Ordinance 1999
Guarantee Companies
Ordinance 1997
Immigration Act 1991 (UK)
Income Tax
(Guernsey) Law 1975
Insurance Business (Guernsey)
Law 1986
Insurance Business (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
2002
Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002
Limited Partnerships
(Guernsey) Law 1995
Migration of
Companies Ordinance 1997
Partnership (Guernsey)
Law 1995
Protected Cell Companies Ordinance 1997
Protected
Cell Companies (Special Purpose Vehicle) Regulations
2001
Protection of Investors
(Guernsey) Law 1987
Trusts Law
(Guernsey) 1989
Regulation
of Fiduciaries and Administration Businesses
(Guernsey) Law 2000
Guernsey
Money Laundering Law
Also
see below under Banking.
In
its Annual Report for 2003, the Guernsey Financial
Services Commission (GFSC) drew attention to
the publication during the year of the International
Monetary Fund's (IMF) report on the Bailiwick's
financial regulation and criminal justice framework,
revealing that Guernsey was assessed by the
IMF to have a high level of compliance with
international standards of regulation in banking,
insurance, securities, trust and company service
provision, anti-money laundering and combating
the financing of terrorism.
Additionally,
the report announced that during 2003, the Commission
was involved in a number of initiatives with
industry, working to ensure that the Bailiwick
maintains its competitive edge whilst adhering
to recognised standards. Director general of
the GFSC, Peter Neville observed that: "2003
was a very good year for the Commission. We
received an excellent IMF report, which commended
our high regulatory standards. These same standards
were cited by Robert Finch, the Lord Mayor of
the City of London, as good reason to do business
with the Island and he acknowledged that we
stand alongside the City in terms of our integrity,
innovation and standards of service."
In
March, 2004, the Financial Services Commission
issued a statement on anti-money laundering
standards for existing customers following the
issue of revised Recommendations by the Financial
Action Task Force in 2003. The statement requires
financial services businesses to assess the
risk of each business relationship and to make
sure that they have customer due diligence information
appropriate to the level of risk.
It allows businesses in the financial services
sector to consider whether simplified or reduced
information is appropriate for low risk businesses
and lower risk customers. This could mean for
example, locally resident retail customers who
have a relationship which is understood by the
financial services business.
"The
Commission has worked with the Guernsey Joint
Money Laundering Steering Group, which contains
representatives from across the finance sector,
in developing this new statement,” explained
Peter Neville. “The
statement extends the existing flexibility provided
by the Commission's Guidance Notes on the Prevention
of Money Laundering and emphasises that unnecessary
demands on lower risk customers should be avoided,"
he added.
The Commission has said that it is not issuing
more detailed recommendations at this stage
on how the FATF standard should be applied in
practice. It has further announced that it intends
to consult with industry over the coming months
by way of observation during on-site visits
and by way of discussions, to develop such recommendations
for inclusion in the revised Guidance Notes.
A revised version of the Guidance Notes will
be issued only after full consultation with
industry and the other Crown Dependencies.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Trust Law
The
Trusts Law 1989 provides a modern statutory
basis for trust management activity. The Edwards
Report acknowledged that Guernsey ranks highly
among IOFCs for the quality of its regulation.
Unlike the banking sector, however, the Guernsey
trusts industry has not been subject to any
formal system of supervision.
Partly
as a result of the Edwards Report, a law was
prepared by the States' Advisory and Finance
Committee under the name of The Regulation of
Fiduciaries and Administration Businesses (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Bill 2000. The law - known as the
Fiduciary Law - came into effect on 1 April
2001.
Anyone
who, by way of business, carries on regulated
fiduciary activities in or from within the Bailiwick
of Guernsey requires a fiduciary licence granted
by the Commission under the Fiduciary Law. Section
2 of the Fiduciary Law sets out the activities
which are regulated, and section 3 provides
for exemption in some circumstances.
A licence is required by any company, wherever
registered, providing fiduciary services in
the Bailiwick and by Guernsey-registered companies
providing fiduciary services anywhere in the
world.
There are two categories of fiduciary licence:
-
A full fiduciary licence can only be granted
to a company or a partnership, and authorises
all regulated fiduciary activities. A full
fiduciary licence authorises the licensee
and its directors or partners, managers
and employees to carry on regulated fiduciary
activities (where the directors, etc. do
so in the course of their duties to the
licensee).
-
A personal fiduciary licence can only be
granted to an individual and authorises
the holder to carry on a restricted range
of fiduciary activities. Those include acting
as a company director, as trustee (but not
as a sole trustee), and as executor of a
will or administrator of an estate. The
holder of a personal fiduciary licence is
prohibited from advertising by The Regulation
of Fiduciaries (Fiduciary Advertisements
and Annual Returns) Regulations, 2001.
The
new law contains a 'four eyes' rule, standards
for capital adequacy and compulsory indemnity
insurance. The offer or provision of fiduciary
services without a licence incurs criminal sanctions.
Prudential rules are also imposed; clients'
funds need to be segregated from other trust
assets; and new accounting safeguards have been
installed.
The
law provides extensive powers to the Guernsey
Financial Services Committee in the granting,
refusal, revocation, and application of conditions
to fiduciary licences. It also has authority
to control the names of, and advertising by,
fiduciary businesses, rights to obtain information
and documents, and powers to conduct investigations.
The Guernsey law of trusts was codified in 1989
along broadly Anglo-Saxon lines in the Trusts
(Guernsey) Law 1989. This law does not apply
directly in Alderney or Sark, but has a substantial
influence on trusts in those jurisdictions.
Trust
documents are in English. There are no registration
requirements for trusts, no fees are payable
on formation, and there are no annual reporting
requirements other than for resident trusts
(ie those with resident beneficiaries). Trust
accounts must be kept but there is no audit
requirement.
The
maximum perpetuity for Guernsey trusts is 100
years. The law provides for non-recognition
of foreign judgements, and forced heirship provisions
in foreign law can be over-ridden. The Hague
Convention has been incorporated into Manx Law.
In
September 2005, the Guernsey FSC launched a
consultation with trust professionals, lawyers,
accountants and regulators to: investigate the
requirement for changes to enable new trust
products and services to be available to the
Fiduciary Sector in Guernsey; to consider the
availability of competitor trust products and
services from other jurisdictions; to consider
marketing requirement for the Fiduciary Sector;
and to make recommendations for the desired
changes.
For
the taxation of trusts in Guernsey see Offshore Legal and
Tax Regimes.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Banking Law
Banks
are registered in Guernsey under the Banking
Supervision (Guernsey) Law 1994 as amended in
2003, which is administered by the Guernsey
Financial Services Commission. Applications
from new banks are carefully vetted both from
a prudential point of view and commercially.
The
Banking Law has three main objectives:
- To
protect depositors;
- To
protect the reputation of Guernsey as an
International banking centre;
- To
protect the best economic interests of Guernsey.
It
contains capital adequacy rules which are stiffer
than the Basle requirements.
In
November 2001 the Financial Services Commission
announced that it would be applying customer
'due diligence' standards according to the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision's "Customer
Due Diligence for Banks" paper (4 October
2001, "the CDD paper").
Section
2.2.3 of the CDD paper sets out what the Commission
now regards as best practice for banks on introduced
business. The criteria listed under paragraph
36 include the recommendation that "all
relevant identification data and other documentation
pertaining to the customer's identity should
be immediately submitted by the introducer to
the bank, who must carefully review the documentation
provided. Such information must be available
for review by the supervisor and the Financial
Intelligence Service or equivalent enforcement
agency, where appropriate legal authority has
been obtained."
Under
Regulation 1(4)(a) of the Criminal Justice (Proceeds
of Crime) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Regulations,
1999, in determining whether a person carrying
on any financial service businesses in the Bailiwick
of Guernsey is in compliance with the regulations,
a court may take account of "the Guidance
Notes on the Prevention of Money Laundering
issued from time to time by the Guernsey Financial
Services Commission and any other guidance issued,
adopted or approved by the said Commission."
The
Commission said its announcement represented
guidance issued by the Commission for the purposes
of Regulation 1(4)(a) mentioned above.
In
early 2002 the Guernsey FSC, along with its
peers in Jersey and the Isle of Man announced
new measures to tighten anti-money laundering
regimes.
The new measures included three main features:
- In
addition to being required to know their
own customers, banks and other institutions
will be required to look beyond their customers
(for example, when they are trusts or companies)
to establish the principals behind them.
-
The new measures tighten up the requirements
on banks and other institutions to ensure
that due diligence is done properly - even
where the customer is referred to them by
another institution which claims to have
carried out the background checks already.
-
All institutions will be required to embark
upon a progressive risk prioritised programme
to bring the records of existing accounts
up to current standards (where there are
deficiencies in information and documentation
held) if the nature of the client or transaction
meets certain criteria.
In
December, 2003, the FSC responded to concerns
raised by the jurisdictions financial
services sector by clarifying kyc rules for
'introduced business' following the introduction
of the FATF's revised 'Forty Recommendations'
which included rules comparable to the Basle
rules but administratively somewhat simpler.
The
FSC said: "Accordingly, from the date of
this statement, the Commission will adopt the
standard embodied in FATF Recommendation 9 (see
below) with regard to the provision of information
to financial services businesses in respect
of introduced business. As a minimum, financial
services businesses should receive written confirmation
from the introducer, by way of a certificate
or summary sheet(s), detailing the necessary
information and the documentation held by the
introducer and also take adequate steps to satisfy
themselves that copies of the necessary information
specified in FATF Recommendation 9, will be
made available upon request without delay."
"The
Commission expects that financial services businesses
should have a programme of testing to ensure
that introducers are able to fulfil the requirement
that relevant documentation can be made available
upon request without delay. This will involve
financial services businesses adopting ongoing
procedures to ensure they have the means to
obtain that information and documentation."
"In
order to determine that the new standard is
being applied, the Commission, during its on-site
visits, will seek to verify that financial services
businesses have obtained the necessary information
by way of a certificate or summary sheet(s)
and that the requirement for copies of such
identification data and other relevant documentation
to be made available upon request without delay
has been tested."
"It
should be noted that, ultimately, the responsibility
for customer identification and verification
will remain, as always, with the financial services
business relying on the introducer."
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Insurance Companies
Insurance companies are regulated by the Financial
Services Commission under the Insurance Business
(Guernsey) Law 1986, updated by the Insurance
Business (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002,
the Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002 and the Protected
Cell Companies Ordinance 1997.
The
minimum capital requirement is GBP100,000; a
fee of GBP3,380 is payable on registration and
annually thereafter.
Annual
audits are needed, and there are substantial
annual information requirements, including business
plans, solvency calculations, reports on claims,
banking and investment schedules, and, for life
companies, actuarial certification.
Insurance
companies can choose between various bases of
taxation, see Offshore
Legal and Tax Regimes and Offshore
Business Sectors.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey Investment Funds
Collective
Investment Funds are supervised by the Financial
Services Commission (FSC) under the Protection
of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
1987 (as amended) and the Collective Investment
Scheme Rules 1988.
Open
ended funds may be established as Class
A, B or Q funds and are constituted as companies,
protected cell companies or unit trusts.
Closed ended investment funds are constituted
as companies, unit trusts, limited partnerships
or protected cell companies.
Open
ended schemes are authorised and entities
involved in controlled investment business
are licensed under the Protection of Investors
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1987, as amended.
The Commission has made a number of rules
under the Law which set out the detailed
requirements to be followed by all authorised
schemes and licensees. These include:
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes Rules 2002
(which cover Class A schemes); The Collective
Investment Schemes (Class B) Rules 1990
(which cover Class B schemes);
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes Qualifying
Professional Investors (Class Q) Rules
1998 (which cover schemes designed for
qualifying professional investors);
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes (Designated
Persons) Rules 1988;
-
The
Licensees (Conduct of Business and Notification)(Non-Guernsey
Schemes) Rules 1994.
Class
A schemes are those which meet the Commission's
Collective Investment Schemes Rules 2002
and are therefore eligible for recognition
by the UK Financial Services Authority for
sale to the public in the United Kingdom
under section 270 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 2000.
The
rules for Class B schemes incorporate a
measure of flexibility. This policy recognises
that Class B schemes range from the retail
fund aimed at the "general public"
via institutional funds to the strictly
private fund established solely as a vehicle
for investment by a single institution.
Their investment objectives and risk profiles
are similarly wide-ranging.
The
Class Q Rules seek to provide a clear and
concise set of requirements for the operation
of professional investor funds and have
been designed to encourage innovation.
A
Qualifying Investor Fund (QIF) regime was
Introduced following consultation with the
financial services industry in the latter
half of 2004, and was welcomed by the island's
fund industry. Under a streamlined application
process, the Commission undertakes to grant
fund approval within 3 working days provided
that an appropriately licensed Guernsey
applicant has certified that: the fund will
be restricted to professional, experienced
and knowledgeable investors; the applicant
has conducted due diligence on the promoter
and associated parties and has found them
to be fit and proper; and the applicant
is satisfied as to the fund's economic rationale
and the disclosure of any risks associated
with the investment vehicle.
New
criteria for Qualifying Investor Funds released
by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission
in 2006 met with support from the island’s
finance industry.
Chief
executive of GuernseyFinance, Peter Niven,
suggested that the move "will serve to bring
more business to the island", whilst Chairman
of the Guernsey Investment Fund Association,
Mike de Haaff, announced that:
"GIFA
welcomes the change in criteria as it brings
Guernsey in line with other offshore jurisdictions.
The change in definition of a professional
investor will encourage more take up of
QIFs and can only be seen a positive move
for the island’s fund industry."
Under the new rules, the definition of Professional
Investor has been widened to include an
individual investor who invests a minimum
of US$100,000 in such a fund.
The
revised guidance note issued by the FSC
also re-emphasised the due diligence obligations
which Guernsey Licensees undertake when
submitting applications for Guernsey Qualifying
Investor Funds.
The
growing use of Guernsey structures as vehicles
for hedge funds has highlighted a number of
areas where the existing investment fund framework
can create problems, leading the Guernsey
Financial Services Commission to issue a consultation
document: The regulatory framework for
Hedge Funds in Guernsey in November
2003, setting out a range of practical issues,
and seeking views from interested parties
on those issues and the solutions which may
be available.
The
Guernsey Financial Services Commission also
issued guidance on the disclosure regime for
closed-end investment funds. That guidance
re-emphasised the flexible nature of the Commissions
approach. Guernsey domiciled closed-end funds
are subject to Guernsey company law and the
Control of Borrowing regime, and it is clear,
from the closed-end hedge funds already established
under those arrangements, that few structural
problems arise.
In
the open-ended sector, the position is more
complex. Open-ended funds are subject to the
Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Law 1987, as amended, (POI) and
to rules and regulations made under that law.
POI provides, inter alia, that all Guernsey
open-ended funds must be authorised by the
Commission - there is no provision for unauthorised
funds and that each fund must have
a designated manager and a designated trustee
or custodian.
In
mid-2004, the GFSC published a document setting
out its main conclusions regarding hedge funds.
The findings are directed at the funds industry
for vehicles which are popular with institutional
investors, said Fiona French, the commission’s
assistant director of investment business:
"We always had the power to waive our rules.
Now we’re saying publicly to hedge fund managers
that these are the ones we’re prepared to
waive to establish funds here. We’re technically
not changing the rules because some elements
we’ve always waived."
Areas
where the commission will show flexibility
include: not requiring a Guernsey-domiciled
and licensed custodian to fill the role of
a suitably qualified prime broker; no need
for complex segregation requirements for prime
brokers holding fund assets; waivers for funds
which can demonstrate a need to use estimates
of net asset value in advance of final NAV
determination; and where estimation is permitted,
there may be waivers of client money rules
requiring segregation of subscription and
redemption monies.
In
May, 2006, the report of a Committee appointed
in 2005 to consider investment sector legislation
and regulation and to report to the Guernsey
Financial Services Commission and to the Commerce
and Employment Department recommended the
creation of a "registered" fund sector, alongside
the existing "regulated" sector. Unlike regulated
funds, registered funds would not need prior
approval from GFSC.
The
report suggests that the same framework should
apply to both open and closed end funds, which
should be subject to a dedicated Funds Law,
leaving the existing Protection of Investors
Law to deal with other aspects of investment
business.
It
also recommended that public offers should
be made subject to specific Prospectus legislation,
rather than to the current Control of Borrowing
regime, and that provision of services to
certain funds domiciled outside Guernsey should
also be liberalised.
The
report additionally recommended that definitions
of investment business in the POI Law be reviewed,
that economic benefit should be abandoned
as a criterion for licensing investment firms,
and that some of the sets of rules made under
the POI Law should be merged.
The
report further reflects on the importance
of expanding Guernsey's intellectual capital
by attracting new service providers in areas
other than fund administration, and notes
the significance of personal tax rules and
housing policy in achieving those objectives.
Peter
Neville, Director General of the Guernsey
Financial Services Commission, announced following
publication of the report that:
"We
very much welcome the proposals put forward
in the Harwood Committee report. Streamlining
authorisation and licensing processes will
benefit: the investment sector by allowing
faster responses; the Commission by letting
its dedicated staff extend their monitoring
of licensees rather than on pre-vetting funds;
and Guernsey in general by ensuring that the
service delivered by Guernsey investment firms
continues to support and enhance our established
reputation."
"Recent
trends have seen new businesses - stockbrokers,
asset managers and private wealth managers
- outside the pure funds sector establish
themselves here in Guernsey. We also endorse
the report's recognition of the importance
of expanding the widest range of investment
activity in Guernsey."
"Once
we have seen how the investment sector responds
to the consultation, we look forward to working
with them, with the Finance Sector Group and
the Department of Commerce and Employment
to bring about agreed change as soon as possible."
BACK
TO TOP