Cyprus
Double Tax Treaties
Cyprus
has entered into 33 double-tax treaties (unusually
for a low-tax jurisdiction). The general effect
of these treaties is that Cyprus-registered
offshore entities that have tax exemptions in
Cyprus will have the same exemptions in the
treaty countries (see Tax-Sparing Provisions below).
In
May 2001, Cyprus announced that it had entered
into double tax negotiations with Iran, the
Seychelles, Lebanon and Armenia. Talks have
been concluded with Indonesia.
In February, 2003, the Cypriot government said it had signed an agreement
for the avoidance of double taxation with Lebanon.
According to a government statement, the agreement
was signed in Beirut by Cyprus' Finance Minister,
Takis Klerides, and his Lebanese counterpart,
Fuad Siniora, and is designed to prevent both
double taxation and fiscal evasion with regard
to taxes on income and capital.
In July, 2005, Cyprus announced that a revised Double Tax Avoidance
Agreement had been agreed with Germany. One
of the more significant outcomes of the agreement
is a clarification of taxation in the shipping
sector. According to the new deal, profits from
international ships and aircraft in international
traffic "shall be taxable only in the Contracting
State in which the place of effective management
of the enterprise is situated".
The new agreement also clarifies the taxation of ships' crews who
will be taxed according to the residential status
of their employer, rather than according to
an individual crew member's residential status,
and includes provisions which seek to prevent
fiscal evasion.
The new agreement will be particularly welcome to the large contingent
of German ship-owning firms based on the island
of Cyprus, which is the third-largest ship management
centre worldwide after Singapore and Hong Kong.
In November, 2005, the Foreign Minister of San Marino, Fabio Berardi,
who was in Cyprus on an official visit, met
President Tassos Papadopoulos and signed a protocol
which may lead to a Double Tax Avoidance Treaty
between the two countries. Many Italian companies
would be likely to use a San Marino/Cyprus axis
in their international structures if there was
a DTAA.
In December, 2005, the head of the Russian tax service, Anatoly Serdyukov,
announced that double taxation avoidance agreements
will be reviewed to prevent companies from avoiding
tax by registering offshore, and to "protect
Russia's economic interests". According to Mr
Serdyukov, the federal budget was deprived of
more than $2 billion in unpaid profit tax by
oil firms during 2004 because the owners of
these firms are resident for tax purposes in
low tax jurisdictions, such as Cyprus.
"We think it would make sense to check all agreements on double taxation
avoidance to protect Russian economic interests
and see whether they correspond to current legislation,"
Mr Serdyukov reportedly told a meeting of the
tax service.
The Russia/Cyprus tax treaty once again became the focus of attention
when the Russian authorities launched tax evasion
proceedings against a prominent foreign hedge
fund mananger. It was alleged that Kameya, a
Russian company advised by Hermitage Capital,
the largest foreign hedge fund in Russia, had
failed to pay the correct amount of tax on a
dividend paid to the controlling shareholder
of a Cypriot registered firm in May 2006.
Commenting on this case, Roland Nash, head of research at Renaissance
Capital, told the Moscow Times in June 2007
that: "The dual tax treaty is a cornerstone
of tax planning in Russia. [The investigation]
could set a precedent that calls the treaty
into question."
It's not clear whether Russia would be able to take any unilateral
action to restrict users of the Cyprus tax treaty.
In July, 2006, the governments of Cyprus and the Seychelles agreed
to a new bilateral pact which aims to prevent
the double taxation of income, and boost investment
flows between the two countries.
The agreement was signed in the Seychelles by the Seychelles' Minister
for Economic Planning and Employment, Jacquelin
Dugasse, and the Cypriot Minister for Finance,
Michalis Sarris.
“The signing is for us in Seychelles very important as it provides
the framework which will enable businesses in
our two countries to exploit the business ties
and cooperation which exist,” Minister Dugasse
commented after the formalities had been completed.
The bulk of any new investment is expected to originate initially
from Cyprus, but Dugasse argued that there is
no reason why investors in the Seychelles could
not also capitalise on the agreement.
Cyprus has also shown "keen interest" in starting negotiations towards
a a Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection
Agreement.
Most
treaties follow the OECD Model Convention, although
the US Treaty follows the most recent model
of United States Agreements. Normally speaking,
therefore, the country of residence will give
a credit for taxes paid in the other treaty
country. The Cyprus offshore entity qualifies
for treaty protection under all the extant treaties
except those with Canada, France, the UK and
the USA, and even in those cases the limitations
apply only to flows of income to Cyprus, and
not to income flows from Cyprus to the countries
concerned.
Revisions
to Cyprus's corporate tax regime consequent
upon its accession to the EU, and the abolition
of the 'offshore' sector as such, have made
Cyprus more rather than less attractive as a
tax treaty partner, and the island will need
to revise many of its treaties as a result,
as well as entering new treaties with additional
countries.
The
following countries have double-tax treaties
with Cyprus (an * indicates that the treaty
is awaiting ratification):
- Armenia*
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- China
- CIS
(ex-USSR)
- Czech
Republic
- Denmark
- Egypt
- Federal
Rep. of Germany
- Finland*
- France
- Greece
- Hungary
- India
- Ireland
- Italy
|
- Japan*
- Kuwait
- Malta
- Mauritius
- Norway
- Poland
- Romania
- Russia
- Singapore*
- Slovakia
- South
Africa*
- Sweden
- Syria
- Thailand
- Ukraine*
- United
Kingdom
- United
States
- Yugoslavia
(Serbia and Montenegro
|
The
new Russian treaty signed in December
1998 replaces the USSR (CIS) treaty
as regards Russia but not as regards
the other member states of the CIS,
who remain bound by the old treaty.
The differences are relatively minor.
BACK TO TOP
Cyprus
Tax Sparing Provisions
A
tax-sparing provision has the effect
that if tax is 'spared' ie exempted
in Cyprus, then it is credited against
an investor's tax liability in his
home country (the treaty counterpart)
as if it had actually been paid in
Cyprus. There are tax-sparing provisions
in the treaties with the following
countries:
|
- Canada
- Czech
Republic
- Denmark
- Federal
Republic of Germany
- Greece
- India
- Ireland
- Italy
|
- Malta
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Sweden
- Syria
- United
Kingdom
- Yugoslavia
|
| The
taxes all or partly spared are as follows:
- Tax
on interest paid on loans for economic
development in Cyprus (Canada, Denmark,
Germany, France, UK)
- Tax
relieved because of deductions in
respect of investment in Cyprus (Canada,
UK)
- Tax
on interest or profits which is unpaid
because of tax incentives, reliefs
or exemptions in Cyprus (Czech Republic,
Greece, Ireland, Romania, Slovakia,
Yugoslavia)
- Tax
not withheld on dividends (15%) if
the exemption is given for the purposes
of economic development in Cyprus
(Denmark, Germany, France)
BACK TO TOP
Cyprus
Table of Treaty Rates
(Excluding
treaties not yet in force; references
to notes are in parentheses after the
rates, and apply to payments in both
directions unless otherwise specified;
all rates are percentages; for countries
not listed the rules are too complex
to be stated here.) |
| Country |
Dividends |
Royalties |
Interest |
| Rcvd.
in Cyprus |
Paid
from Cyprus |
Rcvd.
in Cyprus |
Paid
from Cyprus |
Rcvd.
in Cyprus |
Paid
from Cyprus |
| Austria |
10 |
10 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Belgium |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
nil |
nil |
| Bulgaria |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Canada |
15 |
15 |
10 |
10
(8) |
15 |
15
(11) |
| China |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
| CIS |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Czech
Rep. |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 (9) |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Denmark |
10 |
10
(1) |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10 (13) |
| Egypt |
15 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
| France |
10 |
10
(2) |
nil |
nil
(10) |
10 |
10
(13) |
| Germany |
15 |
15
(3) |
nil |
nil
(10) |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Greece |
25 |
25 |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10 |
| Hungary |
5
(1) |
nil |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10
(12) |
| India |
15 |
15
(2) |
15 |
15 |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Ireland |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil
(10) |
nil |
nil |
| Italy |
15 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10 |
| Kuwait |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5
(9) |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Malta |
(4) |
15 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
| Mauritius |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Norway |
nil |
nil
(5) |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Poland |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
| Romania |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5
(9) |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Russia |
5/10 |
5/10 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
| Slovakia |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 (9) |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Sweden |
15 |
10
(1) |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10
(12) |
| Syria |
nil |
nil
(1) |
15 |
15
(16) |
10 |
10 |
| Thailand |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
5/10/15 |
5/10/15 |
| UK |
15 |
nil
(6) |
nil |
nil
(10) |
10 |
10 |
| USA |
5 |
nil
(7) |
nil |
nil |
10 |
10
(14) |
| Yugoslavia |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
| Notes:
(1) |
15% if received by a company holding
directly less than 25% of the capital
|
| (2) |
15%
if received by a company holding directly
less than 10% of the capital |
| (3) |
10%
if received by a company holding at least
25% of the capital of the paying company.
However, if German corporation tax on
distributed profits is lower than that
on undistributed profits and the difference
between the two rates is 15% or more,
the withholding tax is increased from
10% to 27%. In all other cases it is 15%.
|
| (4) |
Withholding
tax shall not exceed the tax chargeable
on the profits out of which the dividends
are paid. |
| (5) |
5%
if received by a company controlling less
than 50% of the voting power. |
| (6) |
If
received by a company controlling less
than 10% of the voting power, thus entitled
to refund of excess ACT deducted in the
UK (if it controls more than 10% of the
voting power, it is not entitled to the
refund). |
| (7) |
15%
if received by a company controlling less
than 10% of the voting power. |
| (8) |
Nil
on literary, dramatic, musical or artistic
work. |
| (9) |
Nil
for literary, artistic or scientific work,
film, and TV royalties. |
| (10) |
5%
on film and TV royalties. |
| (11) |
Nil
if paid to a Government or for export
guarantee. |
| (12) |
Nil
if paid to the Government of the other
state. |
| (13) |
Nil
if paid to the Government of the other
state, in respect of bank loans, in connection
with the sale on credit of any industrial,
commercial or scientific equipment or
any merchandise. |
| (14) |
Nil
if paid to a Government, banks or financial
institutions. |
| (15) |
Nil
if royalties are on literary, artistic
or scientific work including films, TV
films and radio broadcasting. |
| (16) |
10%
on copyright of literary, artistic or
scientific work including cinematography
films and films or tapes for TV or radio
broadcasting. |
|