Not
having any taxes other than customs duties
and stamp duty, the Cayman Islands did not,
until recently, enter into any Double Tax
treaties with other countries. It has, however,
entered into limited tax treaties with the
UK and New Zealand, and signed a comprehensive
tax treaty with Japan in 2010 (see below)
in addition to several tax information exchange
agreements, which have ensured that the
jurisdiction no longer features on the OECD's
'grey list' of territories which have not
substantially implemented the internationally
agreed tax transparency standard.
Cayman
entered into a mutual legal assistance treaty
with the USA, although the treaty specifically
excludes fiscal matters. In November, 2002
the Cayman Islands also signed a Tax Information
Exchange Agreement with the US (see below).
In
March 2009, the Cayman Islands successfully
concluded technical negotiations on a series
of bilateral agreements with seven Nordic
states, including tax information agreements,
and went on to sign additional information
agreements with G7 and OECD member countries
in 2009 and 2010.
After
the Cayman Islands was forced to accept
'information sharing' under the EU's Savings
Tax Directive in 2004, the UK agreed to
move discussion of a tax treaty between
the United Kingdom and the Cayman Islands
to the head of the queue. “The UK has moved
the Cayman Islands to the front of the queue
of countries and territories wishing to
have treaty talks,” the UK’s Paymaster General,
Dawn Primarolo told government leader McKeeva
Bush in a letter dated May 20. In July,
2005, the UK government reiterated that
it was giving a high priority to the question
of a Cayman tax treaty.
In January 1999 the
Cayman Islands government bowed to pressure
from the UK and passed the Proceeds of
Criminal Conduct (Amendment) (Foreign
Offences) Law which introduces fiscal
crime as a reason for enforcing foreign
blocking and freezing orders - but only
if a crime has been committed in Cayman,
which has no concept of fiscal crime.
The
Monetary Authority has bilateral information
exchange agreements with
14 overseas regulatory authorities,
and a multilateral MoU with eight authorities
in the Caribbean.
In
May, 2006, the Cayman Islands Monetary
Authority (CIMA) and the Office of the
Superintendent of Financial Institutions
Canada (OSFI) signed a memorandum of understanding
that provides a framework for cross border
cooperation between the two countries.
The
MoU establishes a protocol for the sharing
of information and protection of information
shared, cooperation regarding on-site
inspections carried out by one regulator
on supervised financial institutions in
the other jurisdiction, and ongoing coordination.
OSFI
is responsible for regulating and supervising
all federally chartered, licensed or registered
banks and insurance, trust and loan companies,
as well as cooperative credit associations
and fraternal benefit societies in Canada.
CIMA
General Counsel, Mr Langston Sibblies,
noted that the agreement was important
since OSFI, as the federal regulator,
has jurisdiction in all of Canada's provinces.
"The
MoU will allow us to develop cooperative
relationships in a structured and clear
way and will further enhance supervision
of Canadian entities operating here, particularly
in the banking sector," he observed.
The
MoU is subject to the domestic laws of
both jurisdictions, as with other memoranda.
Mr
Sibblies continued: "One area of concern
for OSFI in negotiating the MoU was the
preservation of confidentiality of information
that would be provided under the agreement
and the assurance that information received
would be used for lawful supervisory purposes.
"On
examination of our respective legislation
we were both satisfied that our laws governing
information exchange and deterring financial
crime are equivalent. This facilitated
the establishment of the MoU."
CIMA's
Managing Director, Mrs. Cindy Scotland,
said this agreement underscored the importance
Cayman, as a major financial centre, placed
on international cooperation.
"The
MoU with OSFI again demonstrates our commitment
to assist overseas regulators in a manner
consistent with Cayman's laws as we pursue
our mission of creating a competitive
and internationally recognised financial
services industry," she stated.
On
February 21, 2008, a memorandum of understanding
for the exchange of information and investigative
assistance between CIMA and the FSA, the
UK's national regulator of financial services
and markets, was signed. The agreement
provides a formal basis for cooperation
between the two authorities.
The
MoU is similar to the other agreements
in place between CIMA and overseas financial
regulators. It outlines the types of assistance
that can be requested and given by CIMA
and the FSA.
This
includes: providing, confirming or verifying
information; obtaining specified information
and documents from other parties; discussing
issues of mutual interest; questioning
or taking testimony of persons designated
by the requesting authority; arranging
and/or conducting inspections of financial
services providers; and permitting representatives
of the requesting authority to participate
in enquiries by or on behalf of the requested
authority.
The
MoU also outlines the procedure each regulator
will use for making requests, and explains
how requests will be assessed to determine
if the required assistance can be given.
The
agreement has provisions for the treatment
of confidential information that each
authority may receive under the MoU. Such
non-public information can only be disclosed,
the MoU states, "in accordance with
disclosures permitted under its applicable
laws, regulations and requirements".
According
to CIMA's Managing Director, Cindy Scotland,
the agreement represents a significant
development for the Cayman financial services
industry.
She
announced following the signing of the
agreement that: "The FSA is an important
regulator of a major G7 country. We see
this MoU as reinforcing our strong international
cooperation regime and further demonstrating
our commitment in this area."
In
March 2009, the Cayman Islands and the
seven Nordic countries, comprising of
Denmark, Faroe Islands, Finland, Greenland,
Iceland, Norway and Sweden, concluded
technical negotiations on a series of
bilateral agreements, including tax information
agreements, at a meeting between the respective
delegations held in Copenhagen on March
5-6.
These
were second round negotiations, the first
round having taken place in the Cayman
Islands on April 17-18, 2008.
“We
are very pleased to see these agreements
come to fruition with our Nordic Group
partners. It is proof of what can be achieved
when parties approach negotiations in
a fair manner, and we are keen to continue
this trend, involving, on our part, effective
arrangements for the provision of information
on tax matters,” said Cayman Minister
for International Financial Services Policy,
Alden McLaughlin, adding: “This
is further evidence that the Cayman Islands
does not trade on secrecy or illicit tax
activity.”
The
seven tax information agreements were
signed in Stockholm in April 2009, after
all countries have completed their individual
administrative protocols.
The
collateral commercial agreements, also
signed in Copenhagen, were due to be signed
at the Norwegian Embassy in Paris in mid-June.
The
Cayman Islands Monetary Authority has
also entered into MoUs with regulatory
bodies in Brazil, Malta, Argentina, the
State of Washington, Jersey, Isle of Man,
Bermuda, Jamaica and Panama.
The
Cayman/US Tax Information Exchange Agreement
The
agreement specifies that the Cayman Islands
will share tax information to help the
US government trace financial criminals.
Former IRS Commissioner Donald Alexander
told the US media that the treaty will
enable the IRS to overcome the secrecy
surrounding the accounts of financial
institutions in the Cayman Islands to
allow it to launch audits for tax evasion
and money-laundering.
"Right
now," said Mr Alexander, "nothing
is a fair description of the cooperation
the United States is getting. It's a hotbed
of tax evasion. This is a good step in
the right direction."
The
agreement covers information relating
to "the administration and enforcement
of the domestic laws of the parties concerning
the taxes and the tax matters covered
by this Agreement, including information
that may be relevant to the determination,
assessment, verification, enforcement
or collection of tax claims with respect
to persons subject to such taxes, or to
the investigation or prosecution of criminal
tax evasion in relation to such persons".
Information
has to be provided by the Cayman government
without regard to whether the person to
whom the information relates is, or whether
the information is held by, a resident
or national of a party; and provided that
the information is present within the
territory, or in the possession or control
of a person subject to the jurisdiction,
of the requested party.
The
taxes covered by the Agreement are federal
income taxes, "but the types of tax
covered may be extended by agreement between
the parties in the form of an exchange
of letters". That appears to mean
that the Cayman government can agree with
the US to extend coverage to other taxes.
The
agreement covers "criminal tax evasion",
which means: "wilfully, with dishonest
intent to defraud the public revenue,
evading or attempting to evade any tax
liability where an affirmative act constituting
an evasion or attempted evasion has occurred.
The tax liability must be of a significant
or substantial amount, either as an absolute
amount or in relation to an annual tax
liability, and the conduct involved must
constitute a systematic effort or pattern
of activity designed or tending to conceal
pertinent facts from or provide inaccurate
facts to the tax authorities of either
party."
Information
must be provided even if the alleged criminal
behaviour was not criminal in the Cayman
Islands. The signatories agree to provide
themselves with the authority to obtain
information held by banks, other financial
institutions, and any person, including
nominees and trustees, acting in an agency
or fiduciary capacity; information regarding
the beneficial ownership of companies,
partnerships and other persons, including
in the case of collective investment funds,
information on shares, units and other
interests; and in the case of trusts,
information on settlors, trustees and
beneficiaries.
For the US to make a request under the
agreement, it must provide:
- the
identity of the taxpayer under examination
or investigation;
-
the nature of the information requested;
-
the tax purpose for which the information
is sought;
-
reasonable grounds for believing that
the information requested is present
in the territory of the requested party
or is in the possession or control of
a person subject to the jurisdiction
of the requested party;
-
to the extent known, the name and address
of any person believed to be in possession
or control of the information requested;
-
a declaration that the request conforms
to the law and administrative practice
of the requesting party and would be
obtainable by the requesting party under
its laws in similar circumstances, both
for its own tax purposes and in response
to a valid request from the requested
party under the Agreement.
US officials are permitted under the agreement
to "enter the territory of the requested
party in connection with a request to interview
persons and examine records with the prior
written consent of the persons concerned",
or "attend a tax examination"
in the Cayman Islands.
Information
need not be provided if it is subject
to legal privilege, or if it would not
have been obtainable by the US under its
own laws, domestically.
The
Agreement took effect from January 1,
2004.
BACK
TO TOP
Cayman
Islands Other Tax Information Exchange
Agreements
In
March 2009, the Cayman Islands government
announced that it has put in place arrangements
that provide access to comprehensive tax
information assistance with twenty countries,
including the majority of Cayman’s
major trading partners.
Ireland,
Japan, the Netherlands and South Africa
joined eight other countries afforded
tax information assistance under a unilateral
mechanism, which does not require a bilateral
treaty.
The
Cayman Islands also had eight bilateral
tax information agreements at this time,
which included recent agreements with
the Nordic countries as well as an existing
agreement with the US signed in 2001.
The
unilateral mechanism, introduced in 2008,
provides an additional mode for the Cayman
Islands to deliver on its commitment to
transparency and exchange of information
in tax matters.
“The
Cayman Islands took the proactive step
of introducing the unilateral mechanism
for the provision of information in tax
matters, as a complement to our bilateral
negotiation programme,” said Cayman
Islands leader of government business,
Kurt Tibbetts, adding: “We recognised
the need to increase the pace at which
we could enter into tax information arrangements,
while offering a phased approach to our
negotiating partners under our bilateral
programme in appropriate circumstances.
We look forward to continuing this progressive
approach.”
At
this stage, the Cayman Islands’
tax information exchange network covered
four of the seven G-7 states and seventeen
of the 30 OECD member states.
In
June 2009, a double tax agreement with
the UK facilitating tax information exchange
along OECD standards was signed by Stephen
Timms, then Financial Secretary to the
Treasury and McKeeva Bush, Leader of Government
Business in the Cayman Islands.
HMRC
Permanent Secretary for Tax in the UK,
Dave Hartnett, commented:
“The
information exchange provisions in this
arrangement meet OECD standards of tax
transparency and the agreement is especially
welcome for that."
"Information
exchange enables us to confront effectively
tax avoidance and money laundering whilst
ensuring that we all make the right contribution
to our public services.”
Later
the same month, the Cayman Islands’
government signed a Tax Information Exchange
Agreement with Ireland at a ceremony held
at the British Embassy in Berlin.
Commenting
at the signing, Bush said that the agreement
marked "another important step towards
our ongoing commitment to international
cooperation and OECD standards for transparency
and exchange of information on tax matters.
This signing will commemorate the beginning
of what I am sure will be a highly productive
and mutually rewarding relationship between
the Cayman Islands and Ireland.”
Technical
negotiating teams from the Cayman Islands
and the Netherlands finalised the terms
of an agreement and protocol for the exchange
of information with respect to tax matters
after two days of meetings in George Town
on June 24- and 25, 2009. The text was
initialled by both parties.
The
draft agreement covers many of the standard
provisions in the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) model
agreement for the exchange of information
on tax matters. The agreement was signed
later that month.
The
Cayman Islands landmark 12th tax information
exchange agreement was signed with New
Zealand in August 2009, moving the jurisdiction
onto the “white list” of countries
that have “substantially implemented”
the OECD’s internationally agreed
tax standard.
The
Cayman Islands’ Leader of Government
Business/Premier Designate, McKeeva Bush,
said: “For over four decades the
Cayman Islands has steadily earned its
place as a world-class international financial
services center. The Cayman Islands Government
sees the OECD’s recognition as a
natural outcome of the country’s
substantial commitment to uphold an equally
world-class international cooperation
regime in the exchange of tax information."
"The
Cayman Islands Government is looking forward,”
Bush continued, “to working in partnership
with competent authorities in implementing
agreements it has signed, concluding additional
agreements with Cayman’s important
trading partners in financial services,
and continuing its active role in the
OECD Global Forum, which it committed
to in 2000."
Jeffrey
Owens, Director of the OECD’s Centre
for Tax Policy and Administration, welcomed
the signing, and said that the OECD looked
forward to working further with the Cayman
Islands as it extends its network of agreements
and works to implement them swiftly and
effectively.
The
TIEA also includes an agreement for the
allocation of taxing rights with respect
to certain income of individuals (including
pensions), and provisions to establish
a mutual agreement procedure in respect
of transfer pricing adjustments. It was
earmarked to enter into force after notification
by both parties, after which it will have
effect for taxable periods beginning on
or after the following January 1.
Another
tax information exchange agreement, with
France, was signed on October 5, 2009.
Bush
said: “We hope that this agreement
will act as a catalyst for French companies
looking to diversify into new markets.
Whilst providing the assurance of mutual
cooperation, market access and smooth
capital flows, we are hoping it will contribute
to growth in international business and
to stimulating our local economy.”
Later
that month, the Cayman Islands signed
a TIEA with the Netherlands Antilles,
whilst attending the Caribbean Financial
Action Task Force (CFATF) plenary, held
in Curacao.
The
agreement, the Caymans' fourteenth, was
signed on behalf of the Cayman Islands
by the Cayman Attorney General, Samuel
Bulgin.
In
March 2010, the Cayman Islands government
committed to the signing of a further
16 TIEAs with jurisdictions of economic
significance, in addition to the 14 TIEAs
it had already concluded.
Cayman
Island Premier, McKeeva Bush, and Sergio
Vasques, the Portuguese Secretary of State
of Tax Affairs, signed an agreement for
the exchange of tax information in a ceremony
on May 13.
Said
Bush: “Some of Portugal’s
major financial institutions which have
a presence in the Cayman Islands and are
licensed by our regulator, the Cayman
Islands Monetary Authority. We see this
as a sign of confidence in our financial
services industry and we hope that this
agreement may help expand opportunities
for more commercial activities between
our two countries.”
Also
in May 2010, the governments of Japan
and the Cayman Islands initialled a comprehensive
double tax agreement with provisions to
allow for the exchange of tax information
in civil and criminal tax matters, in
line with the jurisdiction’s commitment
to improve transparency with third nations.
Elements
in the agreement for the avoidance of
double taxation will assign the taxing
rights of the respective countries with
regard to certain income of individuals
such as pensions. It is expected that
under the agreement economic ties between
the two countries will be bolstered.
Welcoming
the agreement on behalf of the Cayman
Islands, Bush stated: “The Cayman
Islands is pleased to have reached this
agreement with our Japanese counterparts,
particularly given the exceptional commercial
relationships between our financial services
sectors. The swift and efficient negotiation
is a testament of both countries’
commitment to uphold and effectively implement
international standards in the exchange
of information on tax matters.”
The
agreement, which at this point remained
unsigned, will enter into force after
the respective countries have undertaken
their individual ratification processes.
May
also saw the Cayman Islands and Germany
entering into a TIEA following a signing
ceremony held on the 27th.
The
agreement was signed by the Cayman Islands’
Premier, McKeeva Bush and by Germany’s
Ambassador to Jamaica, Jurgen Engel.
The
agreement will allow for the exchange
of tax information between the two countries’
tax authorities upon request, where there
is evidence of the perpetration of fiscal
crime, or in civil tax matters.
Speaking
following the signing, Bush stated: “We
have had a bilateral agreement with Germany
in effect since 2005 as part of our implementation
of the European Union Savings Directive,
under which we report interest income
earned by German citizens in Cayman Islands
accounts. “
“Today’s
comprehensive tax information sharing
arrangements reflect our countries’
commitment to upholding and implementing
international standards in an important
area of the global financial services
sector.”
“We
look forward to many more years of successful
work with our German counterparts."
BACK
TO TOP