Hong
Kong Professional Services
Hong
Kong is the most liberal Asian jurisdiction
in terms of permitting participation in
the market by foreign professionals. The
international nature of fund-raising and
merger activities requires professional
firms to go global. Nevertheless, the legal
and accountancy sectors remains relatively
restrictive in many parts of the world.
Many international professional firms have
set up operations in Hong Kong to serve
clients in the region.
The
mainland will increasingly be an important
market for Hong Kong's professionals, particularly
in the light of the PRC's accession to the
WTO.
The
legal services industry consists of two
streams of professionals, solicitors and
barristers. Solicitors engage in general
practice while barristers specialise in
advocacy and litigation. Solicitors can
only represent clients in lower courts such
as the District Courts.
There
are 569 law firms in the SAR, 49 of them
foreign, employing 4,179 solicitors, and
114 firms of barristers, employing 732.
Turnover
of the legal sector exceeds US$1.5bn.
In terms of exports of legal services, customers
are mostly regional offices of foreign multinationals,
investment banks, developers, construction
companies, industrialists, etc., which have
substantial business interests in the region
and would seek legal advice from time to
time to safeguard their interests.
The
Chinese Mainland is by far the most important
export market for Hong Kong's legal services
industry. Demand for Hong Kong's legal services
support comes mainly from foreign and Hong
Kong companies which have investments or
are planning to invest in the Mainland.
Hong Kong's legal sector has however become
a victim of its own success, as waiting
periods for cases to be heard contuinue
to lengthen despite efforts to increase
capacity. Although many cases have been
shifted to the District Court after its
financial jurisdiction was raised to HK$600,000,
a surge in bankruptcy petitions has kept
the High Court caseload fairly static.
The
average waiting time between a request for
a court date and the actual hearing is 216
days in the civil court, although time spent
on preliminary matters means that the average
litigant will have to wait for about 400
days to have a case heard.
A
recent paper on civil justice reform said
the number of judges in Hong Kong had not
changed significantly in the past decade
despite sharp increases in workload.
The
caseload of the High Court has increased
82% since 1991, so that judges have thus
had to cope with higher pressure and bigger
workloads. The panel of Masters will deal
with work in the High Court that encompasses
summary judgments, where a case is instantly
disposed of, and interlocutory applications,
ie technical queries that don't require
a court hearing as such. They will also
dealing with so-called 'taxation', meaning
the scrutiny of legal bills to allocate
costs between litigants.
Accountancy
Rising
business opportunities and the use of international
standard accounting practices have also
attracted the big international accounting
firms to Hong Kong. Most of them have set
up their regional headquarters in Hong Kong.
Smaller-scale local accounting firms will
find it increasingly challenging competing
with the accounting giants. There are more
than 3,000 accounting firms in Hong Kong,
and their turnover exceeds US$1bn.
In
its bilateral agreement with the United
States over WTO accession, China made market
access commitments in the accounting sector.
Foreigners who have passed the National
Accounting Examination will be allowed to
form partnerships or incorporated accounting
firms in China. Hong Kong accounting professionals
should benefit from this development.
The
Chinese mainland is the biggest export market
for Hong Kong's accounting services. Major
export services included: statutory audit
services; investment-related advisory services
(e.g. due diligence); tax advisory; computer
assurance and corporate services.
In
2004, the the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public
Accountants'
corporate governance committee released
new guidelines designed to help prevent
and report fraudulent activities undertaken
by companies in the jurisdiction.
In
addition, the Government brought forward
plans for an 'Independent Investigation
Board' (IIB) modelled on the US Public Companies
Accounting Oversight Board (PSAOB). Announcing
the formation of the IIB, Frederick Ma,
secretary for financial services and the
treasury, said: "The intention is to improve
the independence and transparency of investigation
procedures, therefore enhancing public confidence.
We issued a consultation paper in September
2003 and have received overwhelming support
for the IIB to be established."
In
June, 2004, however, the Government came
under fire for under-resourcing the IIB.
The IIB will have a staff of 10 and will
act on references from other regulators,
but unlike its US and UK equivalents will
not have powers to act on its own or to
create regulatory standards. The IIB should
start its work in 2005, but many doubt whether
it will be successful on such a low budget.
"It is obvious that HK$8 million is not
going to be enough to set up a good investigation
team. With such a low budget, we have to
question whether the proposed board is just
a hollow gesture," said Chan Kam-lam, economic
affairs spokesman for the Democratic Alliance
for Betterment of Hong Kong. "It will not
benefit the Hong Kong market if we set up
an investigation board that does not have
enough money to hire experts and fulfil
its duties."
The
government is thought to have wanted a larger
budget for the IIB, but failed to secure
sufficient financial backing from HKSA,
the the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and
HKEx.