Hong
Kong Banking and Financial Services
Hong
Kong is a fully-fledged international financial
centre, and all types of financial services
are readily available in a business environment
which combines light but effective regulation
with low taxation.
Banking
Hong
Kong has one of the largest representation
of international banks in the world: about
three-quarters of the world's 100 largest
banks have a presence there. Hong Kong is
a top-ten international banking centre in
terms of the volume of external transactions,
and the second largest in Asia after Japan.
The banking sector plays a vital role in
establishing Hong Kong as a major loan syndication
centre in the region.
The
Hong Kong banking system has emerged from
the financial crisis in much better shape
than many of its counterparts in the US
and Europe. According to the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority, the aggregate capital adequacy
ratio of the banking sector at the end of
2009 stood at 16.9% and the liquidity ratio
at 47.8%. The classified loan ratio, despite
an increase from 2008, remained low at 1.35%
and other asset-quality indicators continued
to be favourable.
At
the end of June, 2010, there were 146 licensed
banks, 24 restricted licence banks and 27
deposit-taking companies in business. These
200 authorised institutions operate a comprehensive
network of 1,600 local branches. In addition,
there are 70 local representative offices
of overseas banks in Hong Kong.
Total
Employment in the sector is around 80,000.
Banking assets amount to more than HKD10
trillion.
The
banking system in Hong Kong is characterized
by its 3-tier system, which is formed by
3 types of banking institutions, namely
licensed banks, restricted licensed banks
and deposit-taking companies, which are
authorised to take deposits from the general
public. The 3rd tier of deposit-taking institutions
operate under different restrictions. Only
licensed banks and restricted licensed banks
can be called banks.
China
China's
WTO accession will mean that foreign banks,
including Hong Kong banks can in the future
provide meaningful competition to local
commercial banks, since they will be allowed
to conduct local currency business with
local clients. At the same time, competition
among foreign banks -- already present as
well as new entrants -- will inevitably
intensify.
Under the provisions of CEPA, the asset
requirement for Hong Kong banks to establish
on the mainland is being reduced from a
minimum of HKD20 billion to HKD6 billion,
making it easier for many of the SAR’s banks
to set up in China.
In
December, 2006, eight foreign banks had
applied for retail banking licenses in mainland
China, as the country opened its banking
market under WTO rules it agreed five years
previously.
There
are more than 70 foreign banks in China
already, but until now most of them were
limited to handling foreign currency business,
and they hold just 2% of the country's banking
assets. During the last few years the Chinese
authorities have been racing to clean up
major domestic banks, which were weighed
down with bad debts and clunky administration.
The
banks which have applied for retail licenses
are Hong
Kong's Bank of East Asia, Hang Seng Bank,
Citigroup, Mizuho Corporate Bank, HSBC,
ABN Amro and DBS Bank. Many of these banks
had already taken stakes in mainland banks
and created financial infrastructure to
be ready for this moment.
There
are still obstacles to the growth of foreign
banks in China, however, including a 25%
limit on foreign ownership of an existing
Chinese bank. New entrants to the market
have to incorporate in China as wholly-owned
banks or joint venture banks. Few international
banks have done this; to date, they have
mostly operated through branches, which
are not covered by the new regime, or through
minority holdings in Chinese banks. It is
not clear whether the requirement to incorporate
wholly-owned subsidiaries is in conformity
with China's WTO obligations, although the
minimum capital requirement of USD10bn in
assets does conform.
The
new Regulations allow a fairly wide range
of activities to wholly-owned and joint
venture banks, but disallow bank card business
for branches, something they were previously
permitted to engage in under 2001 rules
which have now been replaced.
2003
saw a number of moves towards greater banking
integration between the SAR and the mainland.
In August, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority
(HKMA) and the China Banking Regulatory
Commission (CBRC) signed a Memorandum of
Understanding aimed at strengthening supervision
of banks operating on both sides of the
border. HKMA operates in effect as Hong
Kong's Central Bank, while the CBRC was
formed earlier in the year to to take over
banking supervisory responsibility from
the People's Bank of China. The 15-department
CBRC says its major responsibilities include
"formulating supervisory rules and
regulations for banking institutions, (and)
authorizing the establishment, changes,
termination, branching out and business
scope of banking institutions.'' It is also
responsible for dealing with problem deposit-taking
institutions. The MOU calls for the two
regulators to share supervisory information
for banks operating in China and Hong Kong
and they will work together to ensure that
a parent bank exercises "adequate and
effective" control over the operations
of cross-border branches and subsidiaries.
They will also meet formally twice a year.
The
Renminbi
An
important Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
was signed between the the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority and the People's Bank of China
on July 19, 2010, which lifted restrictions
on the provision of renminbi services by
Hong Kong banks.
Following the expansion
of the renminbi trade settlement scheme,
the HKMA and the PBoC have agreed to strengthen
co-operation and further promote Hong Kong’s
status and role as a renminbi market platform
in the process of developing renminbi business
outside the Mainland. This is a milestone
in the development of offshore renminbi
business in Hong Kong and a very crucial
step in the implementation of the two guiding
principles set out in the HKMA circular
issued in mid-February.
The PBoC and Bank
of China (Hong Kong) Limited, the Renminbi
Clearing Bank, also signed a revised Settlement
Agreement on the Clearing of Renminbi Businesses.
The Chief Executive
of the HKMA, Mr Norman Chan, said: "Following
the revision of the Settlement Agreement,
there will no longer be restrictions on
banks in Hong Kong in establishing renminbi
accounts for and providing related services
to financial institutions; and individuals
and corporations will be able to conduct
renminbi payments and transfers through
the banks. I expect that many more types
of financial intermediary activities denominated
in the renminbi will be introduced in the
market, helping Hong Kong’s renminbi
business platform leap to new heights."
The renminbi trade
settlement scheme, which was introduced
in July 2009, has been expanded to cover
20 provinces and cities1 in the Mainland,
and their trade transactions with any part
of the world can be settled in renminbi.
Any enterprises in the relevant Mainland
provinces and cities can settle their merchandise
imports, service trades and other current
account transactions in renminbi, while
an expanded list of eligible enterprises
will be able to settle their merchandise
exports in renminbi.
"This is certainly
good news to corporates and the banking
industry in Hong Kong," said Hong Kong
Financial Secretary, John Tsang. "With
an expanded scope of trade transactions
that can be settled in renminbi, corporates
will be able to better manage any exchange
rate risks associated with their operations.
Meanwhile, our banks can also provide trade
related services to customers not just in
Hong Kong but also other parts of the world."
In
2007, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures
Commission (SFC) also entered into a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) with the China Banking
Regulatory Commission (CBRC) for co-operation
and information sharing with respect to
Hong Kong licensed intermediaries who provide
services to Mainland commercial banks conducting
overseas wealth management business on behalf
of their clients
“The
MoU is conducive to further enhancement
of the regulatory co-operation framework.
It provides a solid foundation for the commencement
of effective regulatory co-operation,"
stated Liu Mingkang, Chairman of the CBRC.
"Through mutual assistance and information
sharing, we can promptly identify risks,
and take timely regulatory measures to protect
the interests of investors.”
In
February 2004 the eagerly anticipated move
to liberalise trading and exchange of the
yuan in Hong Kong took its first step forward
after the city’s banks were given the go-ahead
to begin taking deposits in the Chinese
currency.
Analysts
considered this an important first step
towards Hong Kong becoming an offshore yuan
trading centre. "The integration between
the two places will be closer and closer,
so that means that renminbi will co-circulate
with the Hong Kong dollar in Hong Kong going
forward," said Chris Leung, senior
economist at DBS Bank, "Obviously,
if that's the case, there's sort of a demand
for renminbi storage with the banks. So
it's a natural development, but the problem
is there are many technicalities and contradictions
in order for this to become a reality,"
Leung added.
The
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced
in December 2007, that it will review its
work in the area of banking stability, and
appointed former Jersey banking regulator,
David Carse as consultant to conduct the
review.
The
aim of the review was to make recommendations
on how the HKMA can best discharge its functions
in promoting the general stability and effective
working of the banking system, taking into
account recent and likely future developments
in Hong Kong’s banking system, and
the changing nature of the risks facing
it.
The
review was expected to be completed in about
five months. It took into account developments
including the globalisation of finance and
banking business, the increasing integration
of the financial systems of Hong Kong and
Mainland China, the growing complexity of
banking products, the increasing reliance
of banks on information technology, the
increasing need to combat financial crime,
the changing nature of supervision, and
the expectations of the community. Carse
was charged with making recommendations
on the focus and priorities of the HKMA’s
banking supervisory functions over the subsequent
5 years.
Securities
Markets
Hong
Kong is a top-ten securities market globally
and the second largest in Asia after Tokyo.
As of March 2000 the Hong Kong Stock Exchange
and the Futures Exchange were merged into
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. The launch
of the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) in
November 1999 for smaller and high growth
companies has broadened Hong Kong's stock
market, although the timing of GEM's launch
was unfortunate, and the 'dotcom' shakeout
in 2000 weakened its initial impact.
Hong
Kong's securities market has been increasingly
internationalised. There has been a continued
rise in the participation of international
investors in the market. Many of the initial
public offerings through the Stock Exchange
are also made global. The majority of these
issuers are supernational bodies, whose
issues are almost invariably accompanied
by global fund raising.
As at March 31 2010,
1,158 and 174 companies were listed on the
Main Board and GEM respectively with a total
market capitalisation of HKD18,055.6bn.
In addition, there were 3,974 Derivative
Warrants, 1,331 Callable Bull/Bear Contracts,
7 Real Estate Investment Trusts, 61 Exchange
Traded Funds and 160 debt securities listed.
The average daily turnover in the first
quarter of 2010 was HKD64.2bn on the Main
Board and HKD16.4m on GEM.
Of note during the
first quarter of 2010 was the continuing
development of the ETF market on HKEx. During
this period, 18 ETFs were newly listed with
12 tracking Mainland A-share indices and
6 tracking overseas equity indices. The
total number of ETFs listed on the Exchange
increased by 42 per cent from the end of
last year to 61, including 20 ETFs on Mainland
A-share indices.
In
the 2010/2011 budget, the Financial Secretary
announced that a stamp
duty concession in respect of ETF trading
would be extended.
Another
development for the exchange in the early
part of 2010 was the launch of Flexible
Index Options on February 8. Futures Exchange
Participants can request HKEx to introduce
customised strike prices and expiry months
in Hang Seng Index (“HSI”) options
and H-shares Index options for trading,
subject to a volume threshold of 100 contracts.
Flexible Index Options are bilaterally negotiated
and executed as block trades. By providing
central clearing and clearing house guarantee,
Flexible Index Options allows HKEx to expand
its services to the over-the-counter market
for mitigating counterparty risk.
In
2010, the exchange is reviewing a proposal
to introduce same-day securities and money
settlement for stock exchange trades after
a three-month consultation period closed
on February 26, 2010.
Hong
Kong Exchanges and Clearing (HKEx) introduced
AMS/3, a third generation automatic order
matching and execution system, in late 2000.
In February 2001 it added an Order Routing
System (ORS). ORS is an open system that
enables investors to place stock market
orders through the Internet, mobile phones
and other electronic channels, which may
be developed by HKEx or vendors. After an
order is placed through an electronic channel
connected to ORS, the system automatically
sends the order to a Stock Exchange Participant
for approval and submission to the market
for matching and execution.
More
than 100 Stock Exchange Participants have
so far connected to ORS, and are able to
offer their clients Internet trading. All
Stock Exchange Participants, including those
who have connected to the HKEx channel,
will also be able to offer their clients
electronic trading services, including Internet
and mobile trading, through Proprietary
Network System (PNS) channels provided by
vendors.
CCASS
provides settlement services under which
securities are credited or debited to participants'
CCASS stock accounts and funds are recorded
in the participants' money ledgers on settlement
day.
Details
of all Exchange trades, including trade
data and trade amendments, are electronically
and automatically transmitted to CCASS by
the Stock Exchange on each trading (T) day.
There is no need for broker participants
to input or further confirm their trade
details in CCASS. Broker participants receive
Provisional Clearing Statements of their
stock and money positions through their
CCASS terminals shortly after 1800 hours
on each T day for reconciliation. Final
Clearing Statements are available to broker
participants shortly after 1400 hours on
T+1 day for confirmation purposes.
Generally,
online securities trading in Hong Kong was
an early casualty of the dot-com meltdown
and the international equity slump, with
a number of major US brokerages retreating
from the SAR in 2001 almost as quickly as
they had arrived in 1999 and 2000, but by
2003 it seemed that on-line trading would
finally have its day in Hong Kong, as a
combination of better technology, burgeoning
interest from mainland visitors and the
impact of SARS pushed on-line trading volumes
to historic highs.
Fund
Management
Hong
Kong is widely recognised as the leading
fund management centre in Asia with the
largest concentration of fund managers.
The industry is characterised by its international
and offshore nature.
In July 2010, Securities
and Futures Commission's annual survey of
fund management activities showed that fund
management in Hong Kong rebounded strongly
in 2009, despite the uncertain economic
and investment climate.
The SFC says that
the latest survey indicates that international
investors continued to use Hong Kong as
the platform for investing in the region,
with fund management business growing to
just over HKD8.5 trillion (USD1.1 trillion)
as at the end of 2009, representing an increase
of over 45% compared to 2008.
Overseas investors
contributed almost HKD5.4 trillion (or nearly
64%) to that business, excluding real estate
investment trusts (REITs). Meanwhile, the
SFC has pointed out that an increasing number
of Chinese mainland-related firms gained
exposure to global investment practices
via Hong Kong, using it as a springboard.
Licensed asset management
and fund advisory houses continued to contribute
the largest proportion of the combined asset
management business in Hong Kong, recording
the biggest year-on-year increase of 50%
in the value of their aggregate asset management
and fund advisory businesses, to a total
of HKD6.45 trillion in 2009.
In addition, registered
financial institutions recorded an almost
30% increase in their aggregate asset management
and other private banking businesses, to
HKD1.8 trillion last year.
Non-REIT asset management
business increased by 57% to more than HKD5.8
trillion. Of this amount, HKD3.5 trillion
worth of assets were managed in Hong Kong,
with over 80% of these assets being invested
in Asia. The market capitalisation of SFC-authorised
REITs expanded 60% in 2009.
The report also highlights
the growth of the exchange-traded-fund (ETF)
market in Hong Kong, and the first-time
cross-listing of ETFs in Hong Kong and Taiwan.
As at the end of June 2010, 62 ETFs were
listed in Hong Kong. The trading volume
of the ETFs increased by 12.5% to an average
daily turnover of almost HKD2 trillion in
the year to June 2010, while their market
capitalisation rose 30% to HKD180bn in the
same period, making Hong Kong the second
largest ETF market in Asia.
The report also notes
the increasing number of mainland-related
financial institutions setting up operations
in Hong Kong. The total asset management
and fund advisory businesses of mainland-related
companies that participated in the survey
increased 70% in 2009 to HKD155bn.
Separately,
the SFC has reviewed the growth of the retail
fund business in Hong Kong since the establishment
of the SFC in 1989. It found that the number
of retail funds offered to the public has
grown from 783 at the end of 1989 to 1,980
in 2007. In value terms, the size of retail
funds has grown 22 times, from HKD283 billion
to HKD6.1 trillion over the same period.
Although
many hedge funds have been managed from
Hong Kong, until 2002 these were exclusively
for professional investors. In 2002 however
the Securities and Futures Commission issued
guidelines permitting certain types of hedge
fund to be offered to retail investors.
In
April 2007, the SFC entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”)
with the CBRC for co-operation and
information sharing with respect to
Hong Kong licensed intermediaries
who provide services to Mainland commercial
banks conducting overseas wealth management
business on behalf of their clients.
In May, 2007, the CBRC announced a
widening of the scope of investments
allowed under the overseas wealth
management business provided by the
Mainland commercial banks for their
clients. The SFC was at the time the
only securities regulator with whom
the CBRC has signed an MOU and Hong
Kong was therefore the only non-Mainland
equity market in which Mainland commercial
banks may invest on behalf of their
clients. These measures are expected
to contribute to the demand for fund
management services in Hong Kong and
to generate increased investment via
the Hong Kong platform.
In June 2007, the CSRC announced that
QDII fund management companies and
securities firms are allowed to invest
in overseas stocks and other specified
securities that are listed in markets
regulated by a supervisory authority
that has signed an MOU on regulatory
cooperation with the CSRC. Although
the SFC is only one of the 33 regulators
who have signed MOUs with the CSRC,
making Hong Kong only one of the markets
that QDII fund management companies
and securities firms can invest in,
Hong Kong is well positioned to capture
business opportunities based on:
-
close
economic ties with the Mainland
-
a
well-established, deep and liquid
market
-
a
world class regulatory regime
-
a broad range of investment products
-
a critical mass of financial talent
with international exposure and
Mainland
experience
In
June 2007, CEPA IV was signed. Amongst
other provisions for qualified Mainland
fund management companies to set up
subsidiaries in Hong Kong. Together
with prior commitments under CEPA,
Mainland securities and futures companies
and fund management companies can
now participate in the Hong Kong market
through their subsidiaries. CEPA IV
complements the QDII scheme announced
by the CSRC and promotes increased
participation of Mainland intermediaries
in Hong Kong.
BACK
TO TOP