| In
this Section:
- THE
PENNINSULAR OF GIBRALTAR
- THE ECONOMY
OF GIBRALTAR
- GIBRALTAR SERVICES
DIRECTORY
- MAP OF GIBRALTAR
Gibraltar Executive Summary
Gibraltar
Is In The EU . . .
Gibraltar
is self governing but remains a colony of the
United Kingdom, and entered the EU along with
the UK. It does not belong to the EU's VAT, CAP
or common external tariff regimes. However Gibraltar
has implemented much EU financial legislation
and can apply Common European Passport regulations
in the insurance, banking and fund management
spheres. In practice there are sometimes difficulties
connected with the long-running row between the
UK and Spain over Gibraltar's status.
At
a meeting in Barclelona in November 2001, boycotted
by Gibraltar, British and Spanish Foreign Ministers
agreed on a fast timetable for developing new
sovereignty proposals. But by mid-2002 Jack Straw
and Ana Palacio, the then newly-appointed Spanish
foreign minister, were battling to save the talks
from collapse.
Each
side had (and has) a non-negotiable position which
is unacceptable to the other: for the Spanish
it is the need for them to give up their long-term
aspiration to regain full sovereignty over Gibraltar;
and for the British it is the need to accept some
degree of Spanish control over their military
base on the Rock.
In
a referendum held by the Gibraltar government
in November, 2002, nearly 99% of votes were cast
against the joint sovereignty being planned between
Britain and Spain.
By
mid-2003 it was clear that the age-old stalemate
between Britain and Spain had been re-established,
and British Foreign Office minister Denis MacShane
suggested that there was unlikely to be a resolution
to the Gibraltar question for at least thirty
years. "I don't think the people of Gibraltar
will approve any steps on sovereignty until there
has been a long period of calm and good relations
with Spain," said Mr McShane at the time.
In
September 2006, agreement
over a number of outstanding issues relating to
Gibraltar was reached between the UK's Minister
for Europe, Geoff Hoon, Spanish Foreign Minister
Migel Angel Moratinos and Gibraltar's Chief Minister,
Peter Caruana.
Areas
covered by the agreements included the expanded
use of Gibraltar Airport, the full inclusion of
Gibraltar in EU air liberalisation measures, recognition
by Spain of Gibraltar's '350' international dialling
code and unblocking by Spain of Gibraltar mobile
telephone roaming in Spain.
Meanwhile,
in December 2006, Gibraltarians accepted a new
constitution for the jurisdiction, which aimed
to give it more autonomy from the United Kingdom
over its own internal affairs. In a referendum,
60.24% of those who turned out voted 'yes' to
the new constitution, while 37.75% voted to reject
it. 60.4% of Gibraltar's 20,061 registered voters
turned out to vote.
The
constitution, agreed in April of that year by
then UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and Peter
Caruana, and between Gibraltar's two main political
parties later in the year, saw the UK retaining
international responsibility for Gibraltar. However,
the new constitution ceded certain powers previously
in the possession of the British government to
Gibraltar, and allowed the jurisdiction to have
its own independent judiciary.
The
official language is English but Spanish is widely
used. The British military and naval base once
dominated Gibraltar's economy but no more, leaving
behind a highly-educated population with high
unemployment. The excellent port facilities have
not yet been fully re-utilised. Tourism has become
a major contributor to the economy, particularly
visits by cruise ships. The airport connects with
the UK and some other destinations, but it's necessary
to cross into Spain for wider connections.
. . . But Its Economic Future Is Dependent
On Offshore.
Gibraltar
was one of the first of the British dependent
territories to develop tax-exempt corporate forms
for offshore business. It has quite high internal
income taxes, but offers low-tax regimes to both
companies and individuals, as well as incentives
for incoming investment. It is probably the cheapest
European offshore jurisdiction in which to operate
but is smaller than many of its rivals.
There
is a sophisticated business and professional infrastructure.
Business sectors with offshore activity include
banking, insurance, investment fund management,
trust management, shipping, and investment holding
companies. In the past decade, there has been
an influx of UK betting and gaming operations
fleeing high taxes and using the very good telecommunications
facilities to offer Internet betting services.
Gibraltar's
situation within the EU is unique. On the one
hand, its legislative endeavours would seem to
have established it as a very cost- and tax-effective
base for European trading and financial operations,
and unlike some European IOFCs it is not overcrowded;
on the other hand, it is vulnerable to pressure
from the UK and the EU.
In July 2002 Gibraltar's Chief Minister, Peter
Caruana announced a new corporate taxation policy
setting a zero rate of corporation tax for all
companies but introducing new taxes on company
personnel and property occupation which were to
be capped at 15% of profits. The existing corporate
forms which allowed zero taxation, the Exempt
and Qualifying companies, would be abolished.
Debate
between the Gibraltar government and the European
Commission took place over several years (finally
seeming to reach a resolution in December 2008
-- see below for more details), but in the meantime,
the Brussels officials agreed that the existing
situation (confusing as it was) should be allowed
to continue - at least as regards Exempt companies
- until 2010 (2007 for new companies).
Gibraltar
dissolved its qualifying companies tax regime
in January, 2005. In a move estimated to have
cost the Gibraltar government an estimated £1.5
million in annual tax revenues, the remaining
qualifying companies, of which there were about
80, switched to the ‘exempt’ companies regime.
In
March 2007, Gibraltar's Chief Minister Peter Caruana
travelled to Luxembourg to give oral evidence
at the court hearing of Gibraltar’s tax
case against the European Commission in the European
Courts.
The
Gibraltar Government and the UK Government were
challenging the EU Commission decision which stated
that under EU law Gibraltar is not entitled to
have a tax regime different to the UK’s.
Major
changes to Gibraltar's corporate tax regime were
announced in Peter Caruana's June 2007 Budget
speech.
Mr
Caruana explained that:
"The
Tax Exempt Company has been the backbone of the
development and growth of both our finance centre
and the online gambling industry, and thus of
a very significant part of our economy. It continues
to underpin thousands of jobs in Gibraltar and
large amounts of Government revenue."
"In
order to comply with EU law we must phase out
the tax exempt company in 2010. However, in order
to sustain our successful economic model we must
retain a commitment to a very competitive corporate
tax model."
"Since
it is no longer legally acceptable to have one
tax model for ‘local’ companies and
a different one for ‘foreign’ companies
it is necessary to have a low tax system for all
companies because without a low tax system for
overseas companies they will leave, and our economy
will suffer hugely. Thousands of jobs would be
lost, as well as significant Government revenue.
I have therefore already said, and I reaffirm
now, that the Gibraltar Government is irrevocably
committed to the principle of ‘low tax’
for our economic operators."
"By
mid-2010 the Government will have introduced an
across the board flat, low corporate tax rate.
This will most probably be set at 10%, but in
any event not higher than 12%. This will be similar
to arrangements that already exist in Ireland,
Cyprus, Malta and other EU Countries."
"In
the intervening period, the Government will engage
in an intensive, detailed and lengthy process
of consultation with the different economic sectors."
"In
order to signal the Government’s seriousness
of purpose in this respect I am today taking the
first step in the process of reducing corporate
tax rates in Gibraltar, by 2% for the year of
assessment 07/08 from 35% to 33%, and with effect
from the year of assessment 2008/09 by a further
3% from 33% to 30%."
"I
would also signal the intention of a further reduction
the year after that to 27%, in anticipation of
the introduction of the flat low tax rate in 2010."
In
his budget in June 2008, Peter Caruana announced
his intention to bring forward a 3% cut in corporate
tax originally scheduled to take place in 2009,
meaning that the corporate rate would drop by
6% that year.
"Last
year, and in order to signal the Government’s
seriousness of purpose in reducing corporate tax
rates, I reduced corporate tax rates to 33%, and
said that I would reduce it further this year
to 30%, with a signalled reduction to 27% next
year," Caruana told Parliament in his budget
speech.
"In
order to further signal the Government’s
commitment I am advancing that timetable by one
year, and therefore the corporate tax rate is
now reduced by 6% from 33% to 27% with effect
from this year that is the year of assessment
2008/09," he added.
Caruana
explained that he envisaged a further cut in the
rate next year, before moving to the rate of between
10% and 12% from 2010, adding that: "My strong
preference will favour the bottom end of that
range."
In
December 2008, the European Court of First Instance
ruled in favour of Gibraltar, stating that the
European Commission was wrong to argue that the
tax reforms proposed in 2002/03 were in breach
of state aid rules, and effectively giving the
jurisdiction licence to set its own tax rules.
The
Court dismissed the EU Commission’s case,
and stated that although the UK is representative
of Gibraltar, Gibraltar does, however, have fiscal
autonomy from the UK, and therefore can introduce
its own individual tax system (the aforementioned
10-12% corporation tax).
In
his 2009 budget speech, Caruana confirmed that
a 10% corporate tax would apply in the jurisdiction
from January 1, 2011, and that the Exempt Company
regime would be rescinded by the end of 2010.
"It
is essential for Gibraltar’s socio-economic
prosperity that our corporate tax rate should
be as competitive as is compatible with government’s
revenue needs. Without this there would be large
scale loss of economic activity and job losses,”
he told the House.
“Existing
corporate taxpayers will be huge windfall beneficiaries
of the need to eliminate tax exempt status, and
its replacement with a low rate for all companies.
The new rate will be 10%. Energy and utility providers
will pay a 10% surcharge and will thus suffer
a rate of 20%. These will include electricity,
fuel, telephone service and water providers,”
he explained.
Caruana
reassured that the government would allow existing
Exempt Status Companies to keep their tax benefits
until 'the last possible minute': "Most Exempt
Status companies currently hold exemption certificates
that are valid, subject to repeal of the legislation,
for 25 years. The Government therefore feels honour
bound not to remove the tax benefit provided by
the exemption certificate until the last possible
moment. That will therefore occur at midnight
on December 31, 2010, by means of a repeal of
the Companies (Taxation and Concessions) Act.”
|