Gibraltar
Table of Statutes
This is a non-exhaustive list of the main
Gibraltar statutes affecting offshore and
non-resident business. The statutes are listed
in alphabetical order click on the
statute for a fuller description of the statute
or the legal regime it forms part of.
Banking
(Accounts Directive) Regulations 1997
Banking (Auditors and Information) Ordinance
1997
Banking Ordinance 1992
Bankruptcy Ordinance
Companies Ordinance
as amended
Companies (Taxation and Concessions) Ordinance
Deposit Guarantee
Scheme Ordinance 1997
Development Aid Ordinance
Estate Duties Ordinance
Financial Institutions (Prudential Supervision)
Ordinance 1997
Financial Services (Accounting and Financial)
Regulations
Financial Services (Collective Investment
Schemes) Regulations 1991
Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Regulations
1991
Financial
Services (Experienced Investor Funds) Regulations,
2005
Financial
Services (Insurance Mediation) (Amendment)
Ordinance 2004
Financial Services Ordinance 1998
Immigration Control
Ordinance
Income Tax Ordinance 1984 as amended
Income Tax (Allowances, Deductions and Exemptions)
Rules 1992
Income Tax (Qualifying Companies) Rules 1992
Insurance Companies Ordinance 1987
Limited Partnership Ordinance as amended
Partnership
Act 1890 (UK)
Perpetuities and Accumulations Ordinance 1986
Private
Foundation Ordinance 1999
Qualifying (High Net-Worth Individuals) Rules
1992
The Registered Trust Ordinance 1999
Trust Recognition Ordinance
EU
Directives having direct effect in Gibraltar:
Directive
78/660/EEC (The Fourth Directive) as amended
Directive 83/349/EEC (The Seventh Directive)
as amended
Directive 83/350/EEC (sharing of confidential
banking information)
Second Banking Co-ordination Directive 89/646/EC
(passporting)
In
addition, the Financial Services Commission
Act 2007 (FSCA) repealed and replaced the
Financial Services Commission Act of 1989.
The 2007 legislation, in addition to other
changes, placed some of the powers previously
held by the UK in the hands of the local authorities
Further
information on implemented directives affecting
the financial services sector can be found
here.
The
Financial Services Commission website provides
comprehensive access to legislation affecting
the banking,
funds,
investment
services, and insurance
sectors.
In
January, 2005, Gibraltar’s Financial Services
Commission welcomed the publication of a statutory
review of Gibraltar's Financial Services Commission,
conducted by an HM Treasury review team.
This
was the third review commissioned under the
Financial Services Commission Ordinance 1989,
and was requested by the FSC in view of the
rapidly changing regulatory environment in
the United Kingdom, as the Commission is obliged
by the founding Ordinance to match UK standards
of supervision.
According
to the FSC, four key areas of its work were
considered by the review team, these being:
anti-money laundering, banking, insurance
and investment services.
The
report concluded that the Commission’s supervisory
activities, for both insurance and investment
services, established and implemented standards
that substantially matched UK legislation
and practice. Recommendations were made by
the review team as to how the FSC could readily
make the remaining adjustments necessary to
bring it fully into line with recently introduced
UK regulatory developments.
The
team was also satisfied that the Commission’s
approach to banking supervision had succeeded
in developing an effective supervisory structure
that established standards which met its obligations
under the Financial Services Commission Ordinance
to match those required by UK legislation
and supervisory practice.
Gibraltar’s
anti-money laundering regime was judged more
robust than that of the UK in a number of
areas, “even taking into account the different
risks posed by the business”.
In
November 2006, the
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission announced
a comprehensive review of the jurisdiction's
anti-money laundering measures.
The
review saw the GFSC redraft the anti-money
laundering guidance notes for the finance
industry from top to bottom, with the proposed
changes intended to clarify the existing laws
while reducing paperwork and bureaucracy,
and also encouraging finance industry participants
to take a more active role in combating financial
crime and terrorist financing.
Importantly,
the revised rules aimed to bring Gibraltar
into compliance with the third money laundering
directive, which comes into 2007r, and the
latest Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
recommendations.
The
finance industry was asked to contribute to
the review process by the regulator, as part
of a consultation lasting until January 1,
2007.
Commenting
on the review, Marcus Killick, Gibraltar’s
Financial Services Commissioner, told the
Gibraltar Chronicle that there was a need
to move away from a “tick and bash”
approach to anti-money laundering towards
a more proactive strategy that anticipates
new trends, as criminals use ever more sophisticated
methods and complex transactions to cover
their tracks.
“It’s
like a game of chess. We have to think ahead
and anticipate what they are going to be doing
in two moves' time," he told the paper.
In
May 2007, following a review undertaken the
previous year, the International Monetary
Fund endorsed Gibraltar’s robust regulatory
environment, according to the jurisdiction's
government.
The
report was the result of the visit by a team
of nine evaluators from the IMF to Gibraltar
in March 2006. The team conducted an extensive
review of the Financial Services Commission’s
regulatory and supervisory practices in the
fields of Banking and Insurance, as well as
a jurisdiction-wide review of the Anti-Money
Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regime,
which also included the FSC, as well a large
number of enforcement agencies and Government
Departments.
In
all three areas Gibraltar was found to be
meeting international standards, and was found
to be ahead of many onshore - and much larger
- finance centres.
However,
the report made a number of recommendations
for further improvements, which the government
said had mostly been identified and were being
actioned.
Commenting,
Chief Minister Peter Caruana, who is responsible
for financial services stated that: “Government
is committed to continuing to pursue a policy
of proper balance between demanding the highest
regulatory standards from the providers of
financial services and providing an attractive
jurisdiction for the conduct of profitable,
safe and competitive financial services."
"In
this connection the Government welcomes external
assessments such as the IMF Review to maintain
an independent view of Gibraltar’s performance
and to identify what we need to do to stay
at the front of the pack as a leading jurisdiction
in this ever changing industry. I congratulate
all those in the Finance Centre Department,
in the Financial Services Commission and in
law enforcement agencies, for this excellent
result from which our finance centre will
benefit still further.”
BACK
TO TOP
Gibraltar
Banking Law
Financial
services in Gibraltar are regulated by the
Financial Services Commission. The Commission
introduced important changes to the way it
supervises locally incorporated banks and
non-EEA branches in 2002.
Within
this time the FSC had been rolling out a risk
based approach to supervision, where the supervisory
team evaluates an institution in terms of
the risks posed to an institution in the way
it does business or the type of business it
is in. This new approach to supervision aims
to focus supervisory resources on the areas
deemed to be high risk for an institution
in order to ensure that the right controls
and procedures are in place to mitigate the
risks or where corrective action is required
by an institution.
Banking
regulation is exercised under the Banking
Ordinance 1992 (as updated).
Banks
with licenses issued by other EU jurisdictions
have only to notify the Gibraltar authorities
before commencing business there; banks which
require Gibraltarian authorisation and licenses
must conform to criteria set out below.
Licensed
banks must maintain a solvency ratio of 10%.
There is an annual fee of G£5,000 (at
the time of writing) payable to the Financial
Services Commission.
Banks
providing local services are taxable on their
profits in the same way as ordinary companies
(see Domestic Corporate
Taxation); banks working 'offshore'
can apply for a 'qualifying' certificate (see
Offshore Tax Regimes)
allowing them to pay tax at a rate between
nil and 35% as agreed with the authorities.
Licensing and Supervision
The
Banking Ordinance 1992 (as amended) repealed
the previous distinction between 'A' onshore
and 'B' offshore licences, and introduced
a single banking licence. Thus Gibraltar
licensed banks can in theory take advantage
of 'passporting' opportunities and branch
out across the EU and EEA without the
need for further authorisation (except
for notification). Difficulties which
remained with regard to EU recognition
of local regulatory authorities will hopefully
were eased by the Anglo-Spanish agreement
in April 2000 which unblocked the relevant
EU legislation.
The
minimum capital required for the issue
of a banking license in Gibraltar is
(at the time of writing) Euros 5m, in
line with EU requirements, and the supervisory
regime follows EU and Basle Committee
guidelines. In considering the issue
of a banking license, the Commissioner
applies a number of guidelines, including
the following:
-
Directors,
controllers and managers to be fit
and proper persons: the Commissioner
takes into account probity, experience,
skills, judgement and likely degree
of diligence; good reputation and
the absence of a criminal record are
also important; and the nature of
a person's other business interests
is also considered;
-
'Four
eyes principle': the Commissioner
will want to be assured that at least
two individuals contribute on a continuing
basis to the formation and execution
of policy, so that every signifcant
decision reuslts from the exercise
of at least two persons' judgement;
-
Business
to be conducted in a prudent manner:
applicants for a license are required
to provide sufficient information
about the proposed business and its
conduct and development, including
the availability of capital to support
planned levels of lending or investment,
for the Commissioner to be able to
form a view of the stability of the
institution; it is normally unlikely
that a new banking formation will
be able to achieve the right level
of credibility unless it has the support
of an existing and soundly-based bank;
-
Paid-up
capital and reserves will be adequate
to protect the interests of depositors;
large exposures to a single entity
are a major negative factor;
-
Liquidity
must be maintained at a satisfactory
level in relation to the schedule
of liabilities;
-
Adequate
provision is and will be made for
bad and doubtful debts and for contingent
liabilities;
-
There
will be adequate accounting and other
records and control systems to ensure
stability and predictability in the
business;
-
The
necessity that the institution itself
will behave with the highest professional,
ethical and business standards;
-
The
Head Office needs to be in Gibraltar
- meaning that the majority of board
meetings will take place there, and
that the management and direction
should be exercised there; regular
influence on managerial decisions
by a dominant shareholder would be
a negative factor, especially if the
shareholder was not resident in Gibraltar.
During
1997/98, supervisory procedures for banks
were strengthened in several respects
mainly in order to match United Kingdom
standards by transposing all outstanding
EC banking directives.
These
included the 'Post BCCI' Directive
to reinforce prudential supervision
(95/26/EC) which was implemented for
banks by the Financial Institutions
(Prudential Supervision) Ordinance
1997 and the Banking (Auditors and
Information) Ordinance 1997; and the
Bank Accounts Directive (86/635/EEC),
implementation of which was completed
by the Banking (Accounts Directive)
Regulations 1997.
In March 1998, an Administrative Notice
came into effect setting out how the
Commissioner of Banking expects Gibraltar-incorporated
licensed banks to comply with the
requirements of the Capital Adequacy
Directive (93/6/EC); and another Administrative
Notice has been issued setting out
how banks should meet the notification
requirements of the Post BCCI Directive.
This includes more comprehensive reporting
forms and the introduction of a Reporting
Accountants Regime. Under the latter,
all licensed banks are required to
obtain reports each year from an approved
accountant, usually their auditor,
on the adequacy of systems and controls
and the accuracy of supervisory returns.
These reports are then discussed with
management and the banking supervisory
staff.
In
2004 the Financial Services Commission
promoted amendments to the Criminal
Justice Ordinance 1995 which require
auditors, external accountants, tax
advisors, real estate agents, notaries,
legal professionals, dealers in high
value goods and casinos as well as
providers of company managerial services,
professional trustees, insurance intermediaries
and insurance managers to comply with
the anti-money laundering systems
of control. The FSC seeks to update
the Know Your Customer systems of
financial institutions with a more
risk based approach and to provide
more user-friendly guidance for the
industry.
Confidentiality
Within the general statutory duty of confidentaility,
authorised institutions, and their controllers
and subsidiaries, and institutions of which
authorised institutions are controllers,
are permitted to exchange between each other
information about their customers necessary
to facilitate supervision of institutions
on a consolidated basis in accordance with
Council Directive 83/350/EEC (as extended,
where applicable, by the EEA agreement)
or any successor thereto.
In
December 2005, it emerged that an agreement
had been reached between the governments
of Gibraltar and the United Kingdom over
the Rock's obligations under the EU Savings
Tax Directive, which came into force in
July of that year.
The
jurisdiction had come under fire from the
Channel Islands, as its legal status in
relation to the UK and European Union meant
that the Directive did not apply to it in
quite the same way.
However,
under the deal announced by the UK's Paymaster
General, Dawn Primarolo and Gibraltar's
Chief Minister, Peter Caruana , Gibraltar
and the UK exchange information about the
returns on savings under the Directive,
or, in Gibraltar's case only, if the savers
so choose, impose a withholding tax on returns
on savings of UK residents with accounts
there.
The
rate was set at 15% from April 1 2006 to
June 30 2008, following which it will rise
to 20% for the next three years, and 35%
thereafter.
Statutory
Codes of Conduct
The
Financial Services (Conduct of Business)
Regulations 1991 contain a statutory Code
of Conduct for Financial Institutions. Part
Two (Statements of Principle) is laid out
under a number of headings, including the
following:
Integrity - Skill, care and diligence -
Best market practice - Know your customer
- Information for customers - Conflicts
of interest - Customer assets - Financial
resources - Internal organisation - Relations
with the Commission
Part
3 (Core Rules) deals with:
Independence - Advertising and Marketing
- Customer Relations - Dealing for Customers
- Market Integrity - Administration.
Depositor Protection
Gibraltar
has introduced a deposit guarantee scheme
to satisfy the requirements of the EC Directive
on Deposit Guarantee Schemes (94/19/EC). The
Deposit Guarantee Ordinance 1997 was implemented
in stages and a Gibraltar Deposit Guarantee
Board has been appointed.
The
compensation arrangements, are broadly similar
to those available to depositors under the
United Kingdom's deposit protection arrangements.
The scheme covers qualifying deposits in
EEA currencies (qualifying deposits are
defined in the Ordinance).
BACK
TO TOP
Gibraltar
Insurance Law
Gibraltar insurance companies, including captives,
are regulated by the Financial Services Commission
under the Insurance Companies Ordinance 1987
(as updated) and the Financial Services Ordinance.
The
2nd and 3rd EU Insurance Directives have been
implemented in Gibraltar, and the UK Government
has agreed that Gibraltar's insurance regulatory
regime matches UK practice; therefore the
Single European Passport applies - EU insurers
may write direct business into Gibraltar,
and Gibraltar insurance companies can write
direct business into other EU states.
Insurance
companies in Gibraltar, including branches
or subsidiaries of foreign insurers, require
a license from the Commissioner of Insurance.
The Commissioner will take into account the
expertise, skill and experience of the proposed
management team, the ability of an applicant
to conform with prescribed EU guidelines including
solvency margins and guarantee fund levels,
and the availability of adequate reinsurance.
The
cost of an application is currently G£500
and an annual fee of G£2,000 (at the
time of writing) is payable to the Commissioner.
Licensed insurance companies are required
to conform to the following ongoing supervisory
regime:
- A
place of business must be maintained in
Gibraltar at all times;
- Insurance
and accounting records must be maintained
in Gibraltar;
- Financial
statement must be submitted to the Commissioner
within six months of the end of the insurer's
financial year;
- Solvency
margins and minimum guarantee funds must
be maintained at all times; and
- Approval
must be sought for all changes of director,
manager or controller.
There
are a number of sets of regulations dealing
with the detailed conduct of insurance business
in Gibraltar, some of them implementing EU
legislation. The seven main sets are as follows:
- The
Insurance Companies (Valuation of Assets
and Liabilities) Regulations 1996;
- The
Insurance Companies (Accounts and Statements)
Regulations 1996;
- The
Insurance Companies (Prescribed Particulars)
Regulations 1996;
- The
Insurance Companies (Accounts Directive)
Regulations 1997;
- The
Insurance Companies (Solvency Margins and
Guarantee Funds) Regulations 1996;
- The
Insurance Companies (Conduct of Business)
Regulations 1996;
- The
Insurance Companies (Prudential Supervision)
Regulations 1997.
Insurance
companies providing local services are taxable
on their profits in the same way as ordinary
companies (see Domestic
Corporate Taxation); insurers working
'offshore' could traditionally apply for a
tax exemption certificate (no tax payable
at all) or a 'qualifying' certificate (see
Offshore Legal and
Tax Regimes) allowing them to pay
tax at a rate between nil and 35% as agreed
with the authorities.
Protected
Cell Company Legislation
The
Gibraltar parliament, the House of Assembly,
passed a bill for a Protected Cell Companies
Ordinance on 3 July 2001.
The
legislation, which was expected to boost sectors
such as captive insurance and funds, in essence
provides for a single company with individual
parts, known as cells, which are kept separate
from each other. Each cell is only liable
for its own debts and not for the debts of
any other cell within the company.
Part
I - Part I of the Ordinance describes
the formation and attributes of a protected
cell company. A company may be either incorporated
as a PCC, or converted, if so authorised by
its articles, into a PCC. The new law stipulates
that, for the avoidance of doubt, “a protected
cell company is a single legal person,” and
that “the creation by a PCC of a cell does
not create, in respect of that cell, a legal
person separate from the company”. The provisions
of the Companies Ordinance apply in relation
to a protected cell company (subject to the
provisions of the PCC Ordinance, and unless
the context requires otherwise).
Separation
Of Assets - Particularly noteworthy
is Section 5 of Part I, which describes the
duty to keep the assets of each cell separately
identifiable. “It shall be the duty of the
directors of a protected cell company – (a)
to keep cellular assets separate and separately
identifiable from non-cellular assets; and
(b) to keep cellular assets attributable to
each cell separate and separately identifiable
from cellular assets attributable to other
cells.” Directors may “cause or permit” cellular
and non-cellular assets to be held by or through
a nominee, or by a company whose shares and
capital interests may be cellular assets,
non-cellular assets, or a combination of both.
Such assets may be collectively invested,
or collectively managed by an investment manager,
provided that the assets in question remain
separately identifiable. Sections 6 and 7
make it clear that the rights of creditors
are limited to the assets of the cell of which
they are creditors.
Cell
Shares, Cellular Capital And Cellular Dividends
- Section 8 provides for a PCC to create and
issue shares (“cell shares”) in respect of
any of its cells. The proceeds of the issue
(“cell share capital”) are comprised in the
cellular assets attributable to the cell in
respect of which the cell shares are issued.
A protected cell company may pay a cellular
dividend. Section 9 provides that except in
the case of a PCC which is authorised by the
Financial Services Commissioner as a collective
investment scheme, and which is redeeming
units or shares in accordance with its scheme
particulars, no reduction of cell share capital
may be made without an order of the Court.
Section 10 provides that a protected cell
company must state that it is one i.e. the
name of the PCC must include “Protected Cell”,
“PCC”, or any cognate expression approved
in writing by the Registrar. The memorandum
of a PCC shall state that it is such, and
each cell shall have its own distinct name
or designation.
Insurance
Companies, Collective Investment Schemes And
Securitisation - Section 11 states
that a company which is a Gibraltar insurer
as defined in Section 2 of the Insurance Companies
Ordinance, or a collective investment scheme
authorised under the Financial Services Ordinance
1989 must obtain the consent of the Financial
Services Commissioner before becoming a PCC.
In the case of securitisation companies not
requiring a licence under the Financial Services
Ordinances 1989 or 1998 established principally
for the purposes of issuing bonds, notes or
other debt securities or instruments, secured
or unsecured, in respect of which the repayment
of capital and interest is to be funded from
the company’s investments, consent must be
sought from the Finance Centre Director. Sections
13 to 18 deal with the liability of cellular
and non-cellular assets of the company. “The
cellular assets attributable to a particular
cell shall be primarily used to satisfy a
liability, and the non-cellular assets shall
be secondarily used, provided that the cellular
assets have been exhausted. However, any liability
not attributable to a particular cell of a
PCC shall be the liability solely of the company’s
non-cellular assets.”
Parts
II and III deal with the effects of receivership
and administration orders on each individual
cell and on the company as a whole. Part IV
covers offences under the Ordinance.
The
passporting of insurance and reinsurance mediation
from Gibraltar throughout the EEA came into
effect on January 15, 2005.
Passporting
rights arise under the single market directives,
and grant a person in the designated jurisdiction
the right to establish a branch in another
EEA state or to do business there on a cross-border
basis, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions
in the directive in question.
This
was the fourth passporting badge awarded to
Gibraltar, following insurance in 1997, banking
in 1999, and investment services in 2003.
According
to the Rock's financial services authorities,
the passporting of insurance and reinsurance
mediation was enabled by the passing of an
amending ordinance, the Financial Services
(Insurance Mediation) (Amendment) Ordinance
2004 in the House of Assembly on December
22, 2004. The Ordinance amended the Financial
Services Ordinance 1989 in order to transpose
into the law of Gibraltar Directive 2002/92/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council
of December 9, 2002 on insurance mediation.
The
Ordinance provides for the regulation of insurance
and reinsurance mediation, including such
activities as:
- Introducing,
proposing or carrying out other work preparatory
to the conclusion of contracts of insurance
or reinsurance;
- Concluding
contracts of insurance or reinsurance; and
- Assisting
in the administration and performance of
such contracts, in particular in the event
of a claim.
BACK
TO TOP
Gibraltar
Investment Fund Management Law
The
Financial Services Commission is responsible
for the regulation of investment funds in
Gibraltar under the Financial Services Ordinance
(as updated); the Financial Services (Collective
Investment Schemes) Regulations 1991 set up
regulatory regimes for different types of
fund, and implemented the EU UCITS Directive
(85/611/EU).
Investment
funds in Gibraltar are usually formed under
a trust deed either as unit trusts or mutual
funds, or under the Companies Ordinance as
private or public companies. A public investment
company (PIC) must have a minimum paid-up
capital of G£50,000 (at the time of
writing) and if it is not listed on a recognised
exchange its head office must be in Gibraltar.
Funds
formed to be UCITS (Undertakings for Collective
Investment in Transferable Securities) which
under EU rules can be freely marketed throughout
the Union under the Single European Passport
provisions, must be open-ended and are limited
to certain types of transferable security:
- those
listed on a stock exchange in the European
Union;
- those
traded on another regulated market in the
European Union;
- those
listed on an approved stock exchange or
traded on an approved, regulated market
outside the European Union;
- recently-issued
securities; and
- approved,
publicly-traded debt instruments.
The
authorities do not demand that the administration
of a fund must be carried out in Gibraltar,
as long as there is a sufficient strength
of management in Gibraltar to allow for effective
supervision. There is a requirement however
that the trustee of a fund and the manager
should be in separate organisations and should
act independently, even if they have a common
parent.
The
charge on application for a license is G£500,
and there is an annual license fee of G£1,500
(at the time of writing). Fund managers have
traditionally been able to apply for a tax-exemption
certificate (no tax payable) or for a qualifying
certificate (tax payable at a rate between
nil and 35% as agreed with the authorities
(however, for changes to this, see Offshore
Tax Regimes).
In
2005 Gibraltar introduced Experienced Investor
Funds (EIFs) under the Financial Services
(Experienced Investor Funds) Regulations,
2005. See a full
description of this and other fund regimes
provided by Gibraltar law firm Hassans.
In
April 2005 it emerged following the 30th Annual
Conference of the International Organisation
of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) that the
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission’s
application to be accepted as an Ordinary
Member of the Organisation had been approved.
IOSCO
members regulate more than 90% of the world's
securities markets, and IOSCO is seen as the
world's most important international cooperative
forum for securities regulatory agencies.
In
December 2005, the Gibraltar Government and
the UK Government concluded an agreement relating
to the passporting of Investment Services.
The
agreement enables investment services firms
established in Gibraltar to passport (that
is to market and sell) their products and
services into the UK market. The investment
services passporting agreement was expected
to come into effect by March 2006 when Gibraltar
had passed some necessary legislation.
BACK
TO TOP
Gibraltar Trust Law
The
basic law of trusts is contained in the Gibraltar
Trustee Ordinance, which is virtually a copy
of English trust legislation. Gibraltarian
legislation affecting trusts also includes
the Perpetuities and Accumulations Ordinance
1986, the Trustee Investments Ordinance, the
Bankruptcy Ordinance and the Trusts (Recognition)
Ordinance which implemented the Hague Convention.
Appeal is to the Privy Council.
There
are no provisions for the exclusion of foreign
inheritance laws or for the nonrecogition
of foreign judgements. Legislation has not
yet been introduced to provide for purpose
trusts.
As
in the UK, in Gibraltar the essential requirements
of a trust are that it is created orally
or in writing and that a settlor conveys
legal title to real property (land) or personal
property (property other than land) into
the name of one or more trustees to be administered
in accordance with the wishes of the settlor
for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries.
Trust
documents are in English, and there are
no requirements for registration except
that Asset Protection Trusts must be registered
with the Registrar of Dispositions. There
is no stamp duty. The normal perpetuity
period of a Gibraltar trust is 100 years.
There are no restrictions on the accumulation
of income during the perpetuity period.
Gibraltar's
asset protection trust legislation falls
under the provisions of the Bankruptcy
Amendment Ordinance 1992. This is unusual
for offshore asset protection , which
is dealt with under the law on fraudulent
conveyancing laws in most offshore jurisdictions,
as for instance in the Cayman Islands
and the Bahamas.
Fraudulent
conveyancing laws depend for their effect
on the statutory definition of 'intent'
to defraud. By contrast, under bankruptcy
law, which contains no definition of
intent, the only direct action which
can be commenced is a bankruptcy proceeding,
which has a significantly tighter test
of intent.
For
a bankruptcy proceeding to succeed,
it is necessary to show that the target
(the settlor) is resident or domiciled
in the jurisdiction, and that an 'act
of bankruptcy' was committed there.
Since most asset protection trusts are
settled via exempt companies, whose
owner (= the settlor) cannot be resident
and a beneficiary, this will be difficult
or impossible in many cases.
BACK
TO TOP
Gibraltar
International Law
Gibraltar
has not entered into any bilateral Mutual
Assistance Treaties. However, the 1997
EU Directive on the Exchange of Tax
Information with Member States applies
to Gibraltar.
The
Criminal Justice Ordinance 1995 (implementing
EU Directive 91/308) provides inter
alia for the confiscation of the proceeds
of drug-trafficking. Neither it nor
any other piece of Gibraltar legislation
deals with tax evasion.
In
the year 2000 various international
organisations issued 'offshore lists'
in which Gibraltar fared quite well:
-
In
June 2000 the Gibraltar Government
wrote a 'Letter of Commitment' to
the OECD's Financial Action Task Force
in which it promised to comply with
international standards of transparency
and mutual assistance.
-
Gibraltar did not feature on the FATF's
blacklist of jurisdictions that were
considered to have inadequate money
laundering controls.
-
It was in the middle group of the
Financial Stability Forum's "could
cause instability" list along
with Bermuda and Malta.
-
However, three of its offshore company
types were included in the Primarolo
Committee's list of 'harmful tax
practices' in the EU. This is perhaps
the most serious of the offshore
lists for Gibraltar but it was thought
politically improbable that the
Code of Conduct Committee was going
to achieve much considering that
virtually every member state figured
on the list, mostly with quite significant
low-tax regimes.
Nonetheless,
in July, 2002, Gibraltar's Chief Minister,
Peter Caruana announced the territory's
new corporate taxation policy, with effect
from July, 2003, which would include the
abolition of the existing corporate forms
which allowed zero taxation, the Exempt
and Qualifying companies.
Further
major changes to Gibraltar's corporate tax
regime were announced in Caruana's June
2007 Budget speech.
Mr
Caruana explained that:
"The
Tax Exempt Company has been the backbone
of the development and growth of both our
finance centre and the online gambling industry,
and thus of a very significant part of our
economy. It continues to underpin thousands
of jobs in Gibraltar and large amounts of
Government revenue."
"In
order to comply with EU law we must phase
out the tax exempt company in 2010. However,
in order to sustain our successful economic
model we must retain a commitment to a very
competitive corporate tax model."
Since
it is no longer legally acceptable to have
one tax model for ‘local’ companies
and a different one for ‘foreign’
companies it is necessary to have a low
tax system for all companies because
without a low tax system for overseas companies
they will leave, and our economy
will suffer hugely. Thousands of jobs would
be lost, as well as significant Government
revenue. I have therefore already said,
and I reaffirm now, that the Gibraltar Government
is irrevocably committed to the principle
of ‘low tax’ for our economic
operators."
"By
mid-2010 the Government will have introduced
an across the board flat, low corporate
tax rate. This will most probably be set
at 10%, but in any event not higher than
12%. This will be similar to arrangements
that already exist in Ireland, Cyprus, Malta
and other EU Countries."
"In
the intervening period, the Government will
engage in an intensive, detailed and lengthy
process of consultation with the different
economic sectors."
"In
order to signal the Government’s seriousness
of purpose in this respect I am today taking
the first step in the process of reducing
corporate tax rates in Gibraltar, by 2%
for the year of assessment 07/08 from 35%
to 33%, and with effect from the year of
assessment 2008/09 by a further 3% from