It's time we started to take referenda more seriously - By Kitty Miv, Editor

10 November 2011
It was Winston Churchill who said that democracy is a very bad system - but that all the alternatives are worse. I wonder what he would have said about Mr Papandreou, who has been vilified and speedily hounded out of office for suggesting that Greek citizens should be asked their opinion about belonging to the eurozone.

Referendums have had a mixed press: the EU clearly doesn't believe in them, and on several occasions has responded to a negative referendum result by telling the member state in question to try again until it obtained the required answer, rather like a teacher faced with a class of ignorant children.

Some countries enshrine referenda in their constitutions; others don't. Sometimes they are advisory; sometimes mandatory. Switzerland is the best example of a country which makes routine use of referenda throughout its legislative process.

The greatest problem with referenda is how to frame the question being asked, since it is usually under the control of the government in office and is often very heavily loaded. Yet the flaws of referenda are no greater than the flaws of elections in general, and they are arguably a purer form of democracy. Indeed they were the original form of democracy, ironically enough, in Greece.

Possibly the main thing about referenda that stops them being more useful, and more used, is that we don't use them often enough, so that there is no received body of opinion about how they should function. There are certainly no over-arching rules about how to frame the question, whereas there are bundles of rules about how to conduct an election.

Well, it's time we started to take referenda more seriously, because thanks to the Internet they are probably going to be the future of democracy.

It's hard to see this at present, because governments are terrified of being exposed to the direct power of public opinion (Greece is an example). They like to manage public perception via the media, and they control the timing of elections so far as they're allowed to do so constitutionally. But of course in this process they make every possible use of opinion polls, which are a way of sounding public opinion without being directly driven by it.

The media, however, have no such scruples, and revel in their ability to conduct all manner of polls, a game that the Internet has enormously expanded. It's hardly possible to go to a media site of any significance without tripping over an opportunity to vote: should females be as able as males to inherit the throne of England? is a certain doctor guilty? should veils be worn in public? who will be the next president of Russia?

Unlike polling by interview or by mail, Internet polling is instant, and will shortly be capable of being universal. It already is in certain closed communities: voting for the next Chairperson of the management committee of a research institute whose members are spread out across the globe no longer requires a meeting, even if old habits of chicanery, lobbying and 'Buggin's turn' persist in the secretariat. It's true that many of the international bodies thrown up by the process of globalization are some of the most anti-democratic institutions around - the World Bank is a good example - but this is surely just a passing phase.

It can only be a matter of time before some government or other is obliged to allow public opinion (instant, electronic referenda) into its deliberative process, and it can't be too soon for me. The first requisite, evidently, is that every qualified citizen should have access to a voting mechanism during a specified time-frame; but we are already not far off that in the most developed countries. Then the voters will have to be provided with as much information as is currently given to elected legislators (not easy, although most of them won't take advantage of it any more than current legislators read all their briefing papers), and there will have to be rules to balance referendum votes against legislators' votes. A greater than 60% referendum vote to over-rule a simple legislative majority, for instance.

Perhaps it won't be in my lifetime: governments will fight against it to the bitter end. But my children will see it.

Ciao, Kitty

You have been reading an entry on the following blog:

Kitty Miv, Editor

kitty@lowtax.net

Tags: Angela Merkel | Germany | HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) | Hong Kong | Philippines | Russia | Scotland | Taxation | UK | US Congress | USA | Vladimir Putin | WTO

More posts from Kitty Miv, Editor

Hong Kong is at it all the time - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Encomiums and Execrations - By Kitty Miv, Editor

The Faustian bargain between governments and banks - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Being lead to think that the 'battle against offshore' is being won - By Kitty Miv, Editor

The US Treasury doesn't display the bumbling incoherence of Brussels - By Kitty Miv, Editor

It's only a matter of time before robots are given human rights - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Welcome 1984, already 28 years late but coming to your living-room soon!

Sex, drink and gambling - By Kitty Miv, Editor

"I don't know," he said, "but I hope they're nowhere near the Isle of Man." - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Because they are mis-educated, that's why! - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Guaranteed to infuriate the Chinese - By Kitty Miv, Editor

We are squirrels by nature, accumulating against a cold winter - By Kitty Miv, Editor

The real Greek problem, in a nutshell - By Kitty Miv, Editor

When bashing the rich is a good gimmick - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Heading for a dust-up - By Kitty Miv, Editor

If he has any sense he will quit his torture chamber - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Kitty would like to be paid - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Kitty in chains - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Going to the dogs - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Benjamin Franklin was wrong - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Capitalism in 2012? - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Kitty and the banks - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Sowing the seeds of revolution - By Kitty Miv, Editor

"It's the markets, stupid" - By Kitty Miv, Editor

"What has posterity ever done for me?" - By Kitty Miv, Editor

And the Devil take the hindmost! - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Hobknobbing with Singapore finance officials - By Kitty Miv, Editor

It's time we started to take referenda more seriously - By Kitty Miv, Editor

The EU should cut Greece loose - By Kitty Miv, Editor

The amazing success of the WTO - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Bash The Rich! - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Why The EU Is A Good Thing - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Don't Bet On It - By Kitty Miv, Editor

A Market In Countries - By Kitty Miv, Editor

America the puzzled - By Kitty Miv, Editor

Interested in blogging on Lowtax? We are currently accepting submissions!

By hosting your blog on the network you or your company can expect to benefit from our very high traffic levels. We boast one of the largest communities of professionals (tax, offshore, legal, etc) and HNWIs. If you are already a blogger, but want a wider audience, you can move an existing blog to our network, or if you've never blogged before, why not have a go? We'll help you get started.

E-mail blogs@lowtax.net to learn more.