Take the money and run
Contributed by Laveco Ltd. [www.laveco.com]
It is fair to say that
everybody tries to make the most of what they have got, depending
on how the situation develops. In certain segments of business
life - adjusting to changes in circumstances – this
is totally normal. This is the everyday way of life for the
majority of firms in the small and medium-sized category,
who are forced to be flexible and to adapt accordingly in
the face of the economic changes around them.
All too often we hear
the now boring phrase that company X or Y wants to line its
pockets or make a quick killing. The peaceful atmosphere we
once knew is a thing of the past: you can no longer find a
cobbler who spends his whole life stretching shoe leather
over the last to earn an honest day’s living. Instead,
they are now developing trading networks using the MLM system,
and importing the shoes from China, because it’s more
economical this way. Production is cheaper, sales are increased,
profit is higher. It’s obvious.
However, it looks like
the bad example is contagious. It’s as if the tax systems
of some states have got on to this track, and they won’t
deviate from it for love nor money. I recently spoke to one
of my colleagues from Cyprus, who left Hungary to work in
the island state exactly one year ago. I asked her to report
on the situation, asking what news she had. Her reply really
surprised me. “Life here is changing, too; the recession
has reached the island. The state is trying to make money
wherever it can. Parking meters have appeared on the streets
of Larnaca for the first time, so motorists are really being
hit hard, as petrol is also much more expensive than it used
to be. And the fines are brazenly high, so it’s not
worth the risk of just hoping they won’t notice.”
They need money. In fact
they desperately need money. This could be the best explanation
of the philosophy behind the way the state treasuries are
trying to refill their purses. And at what price? At any price.
Morals, fairness, or rather unfairness, don’t count
for anything. The motto is lots and quickly, if possible during
this financial year, as nobody thinks about the future –
it simply doesn’t matter; a politician’s life
may only last for 4 years, then they can try something else,
or wait for an eternity to be given a second chance. The best
example of this is the tax agreement between Switzerland and
the UK. They estimate that the value of bank deposits placed
in Switzerland is around 2000 billion dollars. I’m sure
you will agree with me when I say that even if you have to
share this, there’s still more than enough to go round.
The British, who 2 years ago passed a law which stated that
all tax residents must declare, and pay tax on, all offshore
deposits retrospectively for the last 19 (yes, 19) years,
or possibly even face jail, can no longer wait. They need
the money now. And what a remarkable solution they came up
with. The Swiss take between 19 and 34% from every bank account
with a British beneficiary (it’s not clear, to me at
least, how they decide how much). They then transfer the amount
collected to the accounts of the state treasury in several
instalments. At the same time, the Swiss do not terminate
the banking contracts with their clients, and do not give
the British the names of the people the money has come from.
Then each year they take a smaller amount from the account
of each client and forward that to the UK treasury as well.
Just do some simple sums:
just 19% of 2000 billion is almost 400 billion dollars. They
didn’t have to do much for it, as software can work
that out in minutes. All they had to do was set up the software.
The bank stays happy, as they are providing a service, and
naturally the client will be charged for it. But at the same
time, the accounts stay open, as they have not provided the
UK tax authorities with the details of the clients. The client
can be “happy” as he retains the majority of his
fortune and is not hauled over the coals at home on account
of the dirty money he has stashed away in a Swiss account.
And as for the few honest people who paid the taxes, it serves
them right for taking their money to such a “reliable”
country.
So let’s see just
what the UK stands to gain. They get the money straightaway,
which was exactly what they wanted: to make lots of money
without having to work too hard. They don’t have to
suspect anybody, or set armies of police, lawyers and judges
on businessmen, where they may have to fight for years against
an astute defence lawyer who can drag the case out for years.
And finally, they don’t have to lock thousands of people
up in prisons, where they have to feed and keep them at 100
pounds a day, while also having to defend themselves against
the human rights brigade because of the poor conditions. On
the contrary, it’s better if they are free to go about
their business creating money for the Swiss bank, which in
turn will send out its annual “royalty.”
Let’s face it,
that is real business. Everybody wins, everybody is smiling.
The death of offshore? Whose interests would that serve? Fines?
Yes ok, it’s that sort of game. But let’s not
forget that in the middle ages there was an island country
in Europe whose kings sent pirates out on to the seven seas
to steal for the state. A little bit immoral? Nobody took
any notice of that, and some of the pirates were even knighted
by the king’s sword. Nothing is new, just the method
changes a little? As I have said in this forum before, in
the university of life only one thing is constant, and that
is change. Modern times, modern methods, but the essence is
just the same: take the money and run.
And if there is someone
out there that I haven’t been able to convince, let
me give you a recent example from my own experience. I’ll
be honest: I was caught speeding. If any of you have never
done that and have sufficient evidence to prove it, then I
will pay out a significant reward. It happened on Sunday 29th
August. On September 2nd the fine was waiting on my desk.
They didn’t ask who had been driving, whether or not
they had a driving licence or had been drinking. They had
no intention of dishing out penalty points. They just wanted
one thing: my money. And plenty of it. There was a scene in
one of Fellini’s films - I think it was Amarcord –
when the slightly deranged old man was sitting in a tree and
shouting to the family members below him “I want a woman,
I want a woman.” Blonde, brunette, black, fat or thin,
the details didn’t matter. We are probably going through
times like that now. It’s not unmanageable, we just
have to change our outlook, and understand the unscrupulous
logic of the other side. As my experienced friend Rogelio
said: we just have to replace the chip in our own heads, that’s
the only way to adjust to the logics of change. That’s
the way it is… And there is no other way.
László
Váradi
managing director
LAVECO
Ltd.
hungary@laveco.com
Read More
Contributed Articles
|