PUBLIC FINANCES, BUDGETARY DEVELOPMENTS AND PLANNED
CHANGES IN THE EU AND IN CYPRUS
Contributed by Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC. [www.neocleous.com]
A slow recovery after the crisis
All European Union countries have been affected between 2008
and 2010 by the economic and financial crisis and after a
contraction in 2009 in every EU country, except Poland, growth
returned in 2010 in all but five peripheral countries.
While in 2010 several countries continued to support their
economies through discretionary measures, other countries
had less room for manoeuvres given their underlying public
finance situation trying to consolidate them. In 2011
this consolidation is being stepped up, with all euro area
Member States improving their underlying budget balance through
fiscal tightening.
In the EU 27, because of lasting weaknesses to the public
finances, debt is forecast to rise from 59.0% of GDP in 2007
to 83.3% in 2012. For the euro area the corresponding
figures are in increase from 66.3% to 88.7%. On the
other hand, EU Member States are required by the Treaty to
ensure that their government deficits do not exceed 3% of
GDP and that their debt levels should be declining below 60%
promoting, in parallel, long-term sustainability.
Consolidation plans
The Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs) set out Members
States’ budgetary strategies to meet the requirements
in the EDPs and their progress towards meeting Medium Term
Budgetary Objectives (MTOs) over the coming years. In
early 2011, the newly introduced European Semester allows
for policy advice to be received by Member States ahead of
the approval of their 2012 budgets.
According to the “2011 Report on Public Finances in
EMU”, the coming years will be difficult, in part because
the imprudent policies of the years before the crisis have
left their sign. Further, the provisions of the Stability
and Growth Pact (SGP) were not sufficient to ensure that prudent
policies were pursued.
Reform of the budgetary surveillance
As a result of the weakness identified in the pre-crisis
EU-level budgetary surveillance, the Commission has proposed
a reform package with the aim of reforming both the preventive
and the corrective aims of the GDP. The objective of
this reform should improve the Pact’s ability to ensure
strong public finances with the introduction of sanctions
and two new enforcement mechanisms, at least for the euro
area countries. At the time, when an excessive deficit
is identified by the Council, the euro area country in question
may already become liable to a non-interest-bearing deposit.
It may also be upgraded to a fine, if the country is
later found not to have taken sufficient action in response
to the initial recommendations to correct the excessive deficit.
Nevertheless the EU rules cannot be effective without national
decision-making supporting them, so a new directive on national
fiscal frameworks is part of the reform process.
ESM and debt sustainability in the EU
Alongside the assistance programmes and the temporary vehicles
for delivery funds, the euro area Member States have put together
the permanent European Stability Mechanism (ESM) offering
financial assistance to countries facing difficulties financing
their debt on the financial markets.
It is important for the Member States to be able to assess
sustainability and for this purpose, new methodologies are
being developed providing a probability distribution of the
impact of the banking crisis on the public finances or using
country-level fiscal reaction functions which assess how government
deficits have in the past reacted to the debt level by a number
of macroeconomic and institutional determinants.
The EU and its Member States have provided financial support
to a number of Member States facing problems in meeting their
international payment obligations or financing their debt.
Certainly, it has to be fulfilled the condition that
they implement a closely monitored programme of economic adjustment
based on a Memorandum of Understanding. The main objective
of the assistance programmes is to restore market confidence
in a Member State by correcting financial, external and fiscal
imbalances, maintaining banking sector stability, increasing
potential growth and restoring competitiveness. These
changes involve income and social security policies for the
restoration of competitiveness with social buffers, as well
as structural reforms that boost the economy’s capacity
to produce, save and export for the medium-term recovery.
The QUEST model
QUEST is a global macroeconomic model developed by the Commission.
Parameters such as country size, openness, government sector
size and effective tax rates are calibrated to average values
for EU Member States. The QUEST model distinguishes
firm, household and government sectors and on the expenditure
side, a clear distinction is made between government consumption,
government investment and transfers. On the revenue
side, the model distinguishes between tax from labour, consumption
and capital.
The comparison of alternative consolidation scenarios demonstrates
that fiscal consolidation should be implemented in a timely
manner, as this contains the already accumulated debt stock.
The possible delay of the consolidation to the medium or long
term may lead to debt levels that cannot be serviced anymore
through tax revenues.
Recent economic development in Cyprus and challenges
The moderate recovery of Cyprus economy after experiencing
in 2009 the first economic contraction in 35 years, by 1.75%,
is foreseen to grow by 1.5 % in 2011 and 2.4% in 2012.
Cyprus faces a set of interrelated policy challenges: i) reducing
the high general government structural deficit and ensuring
the long term sustainability of public finances in view of
the demographic population ageing; ii) restructuring
the economy with emphases on high-skilled jobs and training
of the low-skilled groups; iii) ensuring wage and price adjustment
to regain and sustain competitiveness; iv) promoting innovation
and ICT capacity mainly in the private sector and
v) improving efficiency
of public spending and ensuring a reallocation of public expenditure
towards growth-enhancing items including weaknesses in energy
and transport infrastructure.
According to Cyprus Stability Programme, the cumulative reduction
of the deficit amounts to 3.7% of GDP up to 2014 and it is
solely expenditure based. The Programme foresees that
the headline deficit will improve gradually from a target
of 4 GDP in 2011 to 2.6% in 2012, which is the deadline set
by the Council for the deficit correction. The Stability
Programme update projects a continuation of the reduction
in the budget deficit until the end of the programming period.
However, the Medium – Term objective, (MTO) which the
Stability Programme reaffirms as a balanced budget, will not
be met during the period and the budgetary outcomes could
turn out worse than projected in the programme. Moreover,
the timely implementation of fiscal consolidation measures
and the practice of adopting supplementary budgets during
the course of the year may arise risks. Given the large
size of the banking sector and the challenging economic and
financial environments, the strengthening further the framework
of banking supervision to ensure early detection of risks,
would be necessary to safeguard the sector is stability and
its growth.
The national targets derived from the Europe 2020 headline
targets are likely to contribute positively to strengthen
productivity and potential output growth and to enhance the
competitiveness in Cyprus economy. Further, the country’s
strategic objective to create high productivity jobs would
benefit from a reorientation of the education and training
system to match with labour market demand adapted to knowledge
better competition. Boosting effective competition and setting
prices that reflect social costs levels would improve the
sustainability and efficiency of services.
15/09/2011
Christos Floridis
Advocate / Senior Associate
Head of European Affairs
Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC
Limassol
Cyprus
http://www.neocleous.com
Read More
Contributed Articles |